* PJ Weisberg [Wed Jun 15, 2011 at 08:46:22AM -0700]:
> On Wednesday, June 15, 2011, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > I'm not sure if we can make it much more obvious than what it currently
> > says. There's no mention or hint of permissions anywhere in the
> > description you quote, and it specifically
Am 08.06.2011 23:22, schrieb Bill Allombert:
> On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:25:18AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have attached the full patch against current policy.git. This is
>> identical to the previous patches, with the addition of a single
>> sentence to the footnote:
>>
>> "Additi
On Wednesday, June 15, 2011, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I'm not sure if we can make it much more obvious than what it currently
> says. There's no mention or hint of permissions anywhere in the
> description you quote, and it specifically says "co-maintainers."
I believe the confusion comes from the
* Bill Allombert [Wed Jun 15, 2011 at 02:48:11PM +0200]:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 01:33:03PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
> > | 5.6.3 Uploaders
[...]
> > I don't mean to nit-pick but I just had a discussion with some DDs
> > about who should be really listed in the Uploaders field: a) people
> >
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 01:33:03PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Severity: normal
>
> | 5.6.3 Uploaders
> |
> | List of the names and email addresses of co-maintainers of the
> | package, if any. If the package has other maintainers besides the
> | one named in the Mainta
* Russ Allbery [Wed Jun 15, 2011 at 07:30:37AM -0700]:
> Michael Prokop writes:
> > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Uploaders
> > reads as follows:
> > | 5.6.3 Uploaders
> > |
> > | List of the names and email addresses of co-maintainers of the
> > | package, if
Michael Prokop writes:
> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Uploaders
> reads as follows:
> | 5.6.3 Uploaders
> |
> | List of the names and email addresses of co-maintainers of the
> | package, if any. If the package has other maintainers besides the
> | one named
Hi,
I will second Emilio's response here... In the Debian Perl Group, I
have been marked Uploader of many of our packages (though I'm not yet
a DD), since otherwise Lintian complains about it (with the exception
of the more recently introduced new Team Upload syntax).
I would suggest that anyone
Hi,
On 15/06/11 13:33, Michael Prokop wrote:
> I don't mean to nit-pick but I just had a discussion with some DDs
> about who should be really listed in the Uploaders field: a) people
> with Upload *permissions* [DMs/DDs] and therefore actually uploading
> the package (if not being the maintainer
Package: debian-policy
Severity: normal
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Uploaders
reads as follows:
| 5.6.3 Uploaders
|
| List of the names and email addresses of co-maintainers of the
| package, if any. If the package has other maintainers besides the
| one nam
10 matches
Mail list logo
