Steve Langasek wrote:
> I don't think a policy "should" actually moves us down that road, because
> there's no actual penalty for not complying. The issue is *not* that
> maintainers don't, in general, implement this target (in fact, it's been
> around forever in the dh_make templates),
As a cou
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 05:09:33PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > Just for the record, I've implemented support in debhelper's dh
> > > command in #604563. Once applied, this will automatically add support
> > > to the huge chunk of the archive using "tiny" rules files. cdbs will
> > > be next o
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 09:01:31PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Roger Leigh wrote:
> [out of order for convenience]
>
> > Just for the record, I've implemented support in debhelper's dh
> > command in #604563. Once applied, this will automatically add support
> > to the huge chunk of the archi
3 matches
Mail list logo
