I do not think that these virtual packages work for web apps. I took
over two packages (cf. #614598 and #627962) that declared a dependency
on httpd, when both clearly required httpd-cgi. I rebelled and changed
the dependency to apache2.
Also as someone has pointed out already, just because these p
About running webapps as differents user/group, note that it's been
discusses some time ago :
http://lists.debian.org/debian-webapps/2010/05/msg1.html
Jérémy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis
On May 1, 2011 seanius wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 03:51:15PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> > I don't think it's Policy's place to tell people that they can't use
> > hashes because they *might* result in long version numbers. They
> > usually don't.
>
> +1. otherwise, this seems more li
A word about /var/run for sockets : since it's a tmpfs, folders are not
kept, so it's up to the fastcgi backend to create them.
Unfortunately, that doesn't work when spawning is done by the httpd-fcgi server
:
lighttpd, given a "socket => /var/run/myapp/socket" option, does not create
/var/run/mya
4 matches
Mail list logo
