Bug#626338: debian-policy: Clarification of 10.5 symlink wording

2011-05-10 Thread Russ Allbery
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.9.2.0 Severity: minor The wording of section 10.5, where it says whether symlinks should be absolute or relative, is not particularly clear if the symlink is to a top-level file or directory rather than into one (such as a link from /var/run to /run). The intent

Re: Clarification of §10.5 symlink wording needed

2011-05-10 Thread Carsten Hey
* Carsten Hey [2011-05-11 01:06 +0200]: > * Russ Allbery [2011-05-10 15:32 -0700]: > > Carsten Hey writes: > > > > > Besides "/usr -> /", are symlinks to directories still supported as > > > top-level directories and are there still people using such a setup? > > > If nobody uses this anymore, the

Re: Clarification of §10.5 symlink wording needed

2011-05-10 Thread Carsten Hey
* Russ Allbery [2011-05-10 15:32 -0700]: > Carsten Hey writes: > > > Besides "/usr -> /", are symlinks to directories still supported as > > top-level directories and are there still people using such a setup? > > If nobody uses this anymore, the policy could be adapted to the year > > 2011. > > I

Re: Clarification of §10.5 symlink wording needed

2011-05-10 Thread Russ Allbery
Carsten Hey writes: > Besides "/usr -> /", are symlinks to directories still supported as > top-level directories and are there still people using such a setup? > If nobody uses this anymore, the policy could be adapted to the year > 2011. Is there any reason *not* to continue supporting them?

Re: Clarification of §10.5 symlink wording needed

2011-05-10 Thread Carsten Hey
* Russ Allbery [2011-05-10 09:41 -0700]: > Roger Leigh writes: > > > Section 10.5 states: > > > In general, symbolic links within a top-level directory should be > > relative, and symbolic links pointing from one top-level directory > > into another should be absolute. (A top-level

Re: Clarification of §10.5 symlink wording needed

2011-05-10 Thread Russ Allbery
Roger Leigh writes: > Section 10.5 states: > In general, symbolic links within a top-level directory should be > relative, and symbolic links pointing from one top-level directory > into another should be absolute. (A top-level directory is a > sub-directory of the root dire

Clarification of §10.5 symlink wording needed

2011-05-10 Thread Roger Leigh
Hi, Section 10.5 states: In general, symbolic links within a top-level directory should be relative, and symbolic links pointing from one top-level directory into another should be absolute. (A top-level directory is a sub-directory of the root directory `/'.) It's not obvio