Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Hmm, that text seems lousy. For example, I am not a Debian Developer,
> but I never had the impression that correctly documenting when a bug has
> the right number of seconds is unwelcome.
> Would anyone mind if that paragraph is replaced with something along
> these l
Hi Charles,
Charles Plessy wrote:
> I am reading http://wiki.debian.org/PolicyChangesProcess and
> http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Policy to see how I can help to go forward with
> the Policy bugs. Not only for the patches that I sent in 2010 and 2011, but
> more in general for all the patches that
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 07:05:10PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > So this raises two issues:
> > 1) should non-7bit characters in filenames be allowed
>
> Yes, I don't see a good reason to forbid them. In particular when we are
> in an international
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Bill Allombert wrote:
> So this raises two issues:
> 1) should non-7bit characters in filenames be allowed
Yes, I don't see a good reason to forbid them. In particular when we are
in an international environment and we are targetting full localization.
> 2) if yes whould we r
Dear all,
I am reading http://wiki.debian.org/PolicyChangesProcess and
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Policy to see how I can help to go forward with
the Policy bugs. Not only for the patches that I sent in 2010 and 2011, but
more in general for all the patches that are potentially ready for an
inc
Dear Developpers,
there are a small numbers of packages that ship files with non-7bit characters
in filenames.
$ apt-file search -l -x '[\x80-\xff]'
aspell-ca
aspell-es
aspell-is
canorus
console-tools
dvb-apps
ggz-python-games
inorwegian
jpilot
lletters-media
otrs2
wnorwegian
So this raises two
6 matches
Mail list logo
