Helija ievietoja tavaa pasta kastee Karines kruushu tureetaaju!

2011-02-22 Thread Elfride
Haij! Saprotu, ka ir luukota maneejaa profaila foto portala http://www.klimentina.info Liels paldies par bildites vertejumu! (meitenem tas ir svarigi!) Buciishi tev! Fanija -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

Re: [buildd-tools-devel] re buildd's resolver and package's build deps

2011-02-22 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:28:05 +, Roger Leigh wrote: > > > perl (>= 5.10) | libmodule-build-perl > > Could you please explain what's "pointless and/or broken" about that > > one? > > (Except that it's old since even lenny has 5.10.0. > Yes, that's exactly the reason. Because the perl (>= 5.10

Re: [buildd-tools-devel] re buildd's resolver and package's build deps

2011-02-22 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 22:40:52 +, Roger Leigh wrote: > From discussion on IRC earlier this evening, it looks like the most > pragmatic approach will be to get the apt and aptitude sbuild > resolvers to strip the alternatives (after arch reduction), which > will make them behave pretty much e

Re: [buildd-tools-devel] re buildd's resolver and package's build deps

2011-02-22 Thread Roger Leigh
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:21:24PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 06:49:21PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Roger Leigh writes ("Re: re buildd's resolver and package's build deps"): > > > I agree that these do serve a useful purpose for these uses, and that > > > ease of reus

Re: [buildd-tools-devel] re buildd's resolver and package's build deps

2011-02-22 Thread Roger Leigh
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:13:19PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 17:08:18 +, Roger Leigh wrote: > > > · Standard alternative use in the form "concrete|virtual", as used for > > normal deps on virtual packages. Is this sensible? > > · Architecture-specific dependencies

Re: re buildd's resolver and package's build deps

2011-02-22 Thread Bill Allombert
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 06:49:21PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Roger Leigh writes ("Re: re buildd's resolver and package's build deps"): > > I agree that these do serve a useful purpose for these uses, and that > > ease of reuse backporting and other types of porting are important. > > However, the

Re: re buildd's resolver and package's build deps

2011-02-22 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 17:08:18 +, Roger Leigh wrote: > · Standard alternative use in the form "concrete|virtual", as used for > normal deps on virtual packages. Is this sensible? > · Architecture-specific dependencies > · Broken uses. Dependencies on multiple different libraries which will >

Re: re buildd's resolver and package's build deps

2011-02-22 Thread Ian Jackson
Roger Leigh writes ("Re: re buildd's resolver and package's build deps"): > I agree that these do serve a useful purpose for these uses, and that > ease of reuse backporting and other types of porting are important. > However, there is no way to know which of those alternatives applies > to which s

Re: re buildd's resolver and package's build deps

2011-02-22 Thread Roger Leigh
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 05:21:17PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Roger Leigh writes ("Re: re buildd's resolver and package's build deps"): > > Taking one of php5's dependencies as an example: > > > > libdb-dev (>= 4.7) | libdb4.8-dev | libdb4.6-dev > > > > This dependency permits building against

Re: re buildd's resolver and package's build deps

2011-02-22 Thread Ian Jackson
Roger Leigh writes ("Re: re buildd's resolver and package's build deps"): > Taking one of php5's dependencies as an example: > > libdb-dev (>= 4.7) | libdb4.8-dev | libdb4.6-dev > > This dependency permits building against no less than *three* different > Berkeley DB versions. Given that these

Re: re buildd's resolver and package's build deps

2011-02-22 Thread Roger Leigh
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 07:42:32PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Hi everyone, Roger, > > Roger Leigh has filed a few bug reports related to how the buildd's resolver > (either internal or any of the new ones: apt{,itude}) and I'm not sure I > quiet agree. > Let's take for example the one filed

Adelaida ielika tev piederoshajaa e-mailaa Alevtines biksites!

2011-02-22 Thread Janeka
Sveicieni! Notveru mirkli, ka ir skatita maneeja profila foto portala http://www.kintija.info Baigais paldies par ekstru! (meitenem tas ir svarigi!) Buchinjas (jaukas) tev! Skolastika -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". T