Russ Allbery writes:
> I'm hesitant to recommend moving the documentation to /usr/share/doc/foo
> when we've always put it in a directory named after the package in the
> past; I'm afraid long-time Debian users won't be able to find it.
I'd certainly be confused!
Being able to just look in /usr/
Package: debian-policy
Severity: minor
The debian policy section 9.5 [1] suggests using the package name as a
file name when creating files in /etc/cron.d, /etc/cron.hourly,
/etc/cron.daily etc. This works well *unless* the package name
includes a dot ('.'), as this forces the file name to inclu
Package: debian-policy
Version: n/a
Attached please find a patch that adds a copy of DEP5 to the
debian-policy package. I have attempted to add it to the Makefile and
debian/rules file, but not sure if I did it in a good way.
The actual spec text is identical to the one on the DEP site
(http://de
Ian Jackson writes:
> Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Directories named after packages"):
>> See http://bugs.debian.org/106073 and the discussion there. Wording
>> proposals very welcome.
> OMG it's from 2001 ...
Yeah, it's almost old enough that I can blame you for the fact that it
wasn't specified
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 608324 debian-policy
Bug #608324 [base-files] please add Affero license to /usr/share/common-licenses
Bug reassigned from package 'base-files' to 'debian-policy'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions base-files/6.0.
> thanks
Stopping
reassign 608324 debian-policy
thanks
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> Package: base-files
> Version: 6.0
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi,
>
> I have seen you did recently an update of the licenses from
> http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/Licenses/ but you did not include the Affero
> license http://
6 matches
Mail list logo
