Bug#604990: clarify man page dates policy

2010-11-26 Thread jidanni
> "H" == Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes: H> There is no need. This is documented in man-pages(7). Ah, maybe the policy doc should just mention "See also man-pages(7)". -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac

developers-reference_3.4.4_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2010-11-26 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: developers-reference-fr_3.4.4_all.deb to main/d/developers-reference/developers-reference-fr_3.4.4_all.deb developers-reference-ja_3.4.4_all.deb to main/d/developers-reference/developers-reference-ja_3.4.4_all.deb developers-reference_3.4.4.dsc to main/d/developers-reference/deve

Bug#585161: marked as done (Section 4.8: Mirror pulses are made twice a day.)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:02:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#585161: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #585161, regarding Section 4.8: Mirror pulses are made twice a day. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#578664: marked as done (developers-reference: outdated examples in pkgs/resources.dbk)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:02:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#578664: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #578664, regarding developers-reference: outdated examples in pkgs/resources.dbk to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#567235: marked as done (developers-reference: update number of packages and developers)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:02:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#567235: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #567235, regarding developers-reference: update number of packages and developers to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#573110: marked as done (developers-reference: Team uploads.)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:02:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#573110: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #573110, regarding developers-reference: Team uploads. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#567234: marked as done (developers-reference: change architectures list)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:02:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#567234: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #567234, regarding developers-reference: change architectures list to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#567233: marked as done (developers-reference: typo fixes in pkgs/resources.dbk)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:02:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#567233: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #567233, regarding developers-reference: typo fixes in pkgs/resources.dbk to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#564414: marked as done (developers-reference: wiki page for Debian maintainers is /DebianMaintainer)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:02:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#564414: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #564414, regarding developers-reference: wiki page for Debian maintainers is /DebianMaintainer to be marked as done. This means tha

Bug#564068: marked as done (developers-reference: alioth section mentions GForge instead of FusionForge)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:02:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#564068: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #564068, regarding developers-reference: alioth section mentions GForge instead of FusionForge to be marked as done. This means tha

Bug#561952: marked as done (developers-reference: Section 4.6.3 - please document new source package formats "3.0 (quilt)" and "3.0 (native)")

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:02:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#561952: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #561952, regarding developers-reference: Section 4.6.3 - please document new source package formats "3.0 (quilt)" and "3.0 (native)"

Bug#554077: marked as done (developers-reference: 5.6.4: please refer to queues which are not down)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:02:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#561597: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #561597, regarding developers-reference: 5.6.4: please refer to queues which are not down to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#561597: marked as done (developers-reference: servers in upload queue list is old)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:02:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#561597: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #561597, regarding developers-reference: servers in upload queue list is old to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#560808: marked as done (developers-reference: typo (programms -> programs))

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:02:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#560808: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #560808, regarding developers-reference: typo (programms -> programs) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#557298: marked as done (developers-reference: Suggestion for manpage formats easier than troff.)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:02:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#557298: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #557298, regarding developers-reference: Suggestion for manpage formats easier than troff. to be marked as done. This means that yo

Bug#556229: marked as done (developers-reference: Update the URL to security-tracker to the .org URL)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:02:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#556229: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #556229, regarding developers-reference: Update the URL to security-tracker to the .org URL to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#555685: marked as done (developers-reference: typo "transferred" instead of "transfered")

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:02:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#555685: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #555685, regarding developers-reference: typo "transferred" instead of "transfered" to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#561597: marked as done (developers-reference: servers in upload queue list is old)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:02:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#554077: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #554077, regarding developers-reference: servers in upload queue list is old to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#554077: marked as done (developers-reference: 5.6.4: please refer to queues which are not down)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:02:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#554077: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #554077, regarding developers-reference: 5.6.4: please refer to queues which are not down to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#554054: marked as done (developers-reference: 5.6: s/ftp-master.debian.org/ftp.upload.debian.org/)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:02:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#554054: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #554054, regarding developers-reference: 5.6: s/ftp-master.debian.org/ftp.upload.debian.org/ to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#553974: marked as done (developers-reference: out-of-date link to Packages-arch-specific)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:02:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#553974: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #553974, regarding developers-reference: out-of-date link to Packages-arch-specific to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#548823: marked as done (devref: please point to text file to get #debian-private password)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:02:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#548823: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #548823, regarding devref: please point to text file to get #debian-private password to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#540974: marked as done (Include full URL to UploadQueue/README)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:02:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#540974: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #540974, regarding Include full URL to UploadQueue/README to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#540231: marked as done ([jo...@ganneff.de: Override changes])

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:02:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#540231: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #540231, regarding [jo...@ganneff.de: Override changes] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#469154: marked as done (chapter 4.10: PTS summary description needs update)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:02:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#469154: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #469154, regarding chapter 4.10: PTS summary description needs update to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#483233: marked as done (developers-reference: Section 8.1 - it's not explained anywhare what DDTP is)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:02:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#257150: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #257150, regarding developers-reference: Section 8.1 - it's not explained anywhare what DDTP is to be marked as done. This means th

Bug#257150: marked as done (Paragraph about i18ned documentation is outdated)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:02:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#257150: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #257150, regarding Paragraph about i18ned documentation is outdated to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#604990: clarify man page dates policy

2010-11-26 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > The Debian Policy Manual should state what the preferred date on manual > pages should be, or wishes upstream would make it. There is no need. This is documented in man-pages(7). It is the date the manpage was last revised. > Also mention if Deb