Bug#599944: 3.5 Dependencies / 7.2 Binary Dependencies - missing cross-reference to Pre-Depends policy.

2010-10-12 Thread Mattias Ellert
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.9.1.0 Severity: normal The policy for when it is allowed to declare a Pre-Depends is currently split between two different sections in the policy: Section 3.5 says: "You should not specify a Pre-Depends entry for a package before this has been discussed on the d

Bug#593909: Names of Fields in Control Files

2010-10-12 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 00:18:49 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > From: Charles Plessy > Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 00:14:42 +0900 > Subject: [PATCH] Clarification of the format of control files, Closes: > #501930, #593909. > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > Content-Transf

Bug#593909: Names of Fields in Control Files

2010-10-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Charles Plessy writes: > Here is an updated patch, that contains the following: > Each paragraph consists of a series of data fields; each > field consists of the field name, followed by a colon and > - then the data/value associated with that field. It ends at > -

Bug#593909: Names of Fields in Control Files

2010-10-12 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 03:13:43PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit : > Charles Plessy writes: > > > how about simply paraphrasing the RFC 822/5832, which our the source of > > inspiration ? In that case, the requirement for field names will be to > > be printable ASCII characters, except colons. > >