Bug#586163: marked as done (debian-policy: Replace jargon term "Debianise" with terms in common usage)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#586163: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #586163, regarding debian-policy: Replace jargon term "Debianise" with terms in common usage to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#584796: marked as done (debian-policy: Typo "programs" in footnote 85 (section 12.1))

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#584796: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #584796, regarding debian-policy: Typo "programs" in footnote 85 (section 12.1) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#584521: marked as done (debian-policy: Process.html difficult to read and missing "State C")

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#584521: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #584521, regarding debian-policy: Process.html difficult to read and missing "State C" to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#582495: marked as done (debian-policy: extend UID range of user accounts)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#582495: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #582495, regarding debian-policy: extend UID range of user accounts to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#161912: marked as done (Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#582495: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #582495, regarding Drop 3-5 uid/gid reservation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

Bug#579461: marked as done (debian-policy: perl: ExtUtils::MakeMaker and PREFIX)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#579461: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #579461, regarding debian-policy: perl: ExtUtils::MakeMaker and PREFIX to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#579457: marked as done (debian-policy: finer granularity for perlapi-*)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#579457: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #579457, regarding debian-policy: finer granularity for perlapi-* to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#578852: marked as done (clarify installation of package having reverse-Replaces)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#578854: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #578854, regarding clarify installation of package having reverse-Replaces to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#578854: marked as done (debian-policy: Wording about Conflicts needs to be clarified)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#578854: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #578854, regarding debian-policy: Wording about Conflicts needs to be clarified to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#577666: marked as done (debian-policy: Section list missing: base debian-installer)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#577666: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #577666, regarding debian-policy: Section list missing: base debian-installer to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#576594: marked as done (debian-policy: Unclear "it" in Perl policy 2.2)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#576594: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #576594, regarding debian-policy: Unclear "it" in Perl policy 2.2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#575639: marked as done (Clarify that Changed-By must have name and email address)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#575639: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #575639, regarding Clarify that Changed-By must have name and email address to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#572253: marked as done (debian-policy: example for usage of Replaces: when a package is split)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#572253: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #572253, regarding debian-policy: example for usage of Replaces: when a package is split to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#569174: marked as done (debian-policy: Changelog date is not in RFC822 format.)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#569174: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #569174, regarding debian-policy: Changelog date is not in RFC822 format. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#567845: marked as done (debian-policy: broken formatting of upgrading-checklist.txt?)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#567845: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #567845, regarding debian-policy: broken formatting of upgrading-checklist.txt? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#566220: marked as done ([PATCH] Clarify "verbatim copy of its copyright and distribution license")

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#566220: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #566220, regarding [PATCH] Clarify "verbatim copy of its copyright and distribution license" to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#563425: marked as done (debian-policy: please clarify the second footnote of section 10.9.)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#563425: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #563425, regarding debian-policy: please clarify the second footnote of section 10.9. to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#562506: marked as done (init scripts should not use set -e)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#562506: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #562506, regarding init scripts should not use set -e to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#560839: marked as done (debian-policy: please move digressions into footnotes)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#560839: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #560839, regarding debian-policy: please move digressions into footnotes to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#560411: marked as done (debian-policy: Document debconf's SETTITLE command in the debconf-spec)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#560411: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #560411, regarding debian-policy: Document debconf's SETTITLE command in the debconf-spec to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#558430: marked as done (debian-policy: 5.6.21. `Files' contains typo regarding orig.tar.gz original source tarball)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#558430: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #558430, regarding debian-policy: 5.6.21. `Files' contains typo regarding orig.tar.gz original source tarball to be marked as done. This

Bug#555978: marked as done (debian-policy: Forbid duplicate fields in control files)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#555978: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #555978, regarding debian-policy: Forbid duplicate fields in control files to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#547272: marked as done (policy 5.6.16 - Format field: Is it really 1.5?)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#547272: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #547272, regarding policy 5.6.16 - Format field: Is it really 1.5? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#555009: marked as done (debian-policy: alt. changelog formats are still advertised)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#555009: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #555009, regarding debian-policy: alt. changelog formats are still advertised to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#530687: marked as done (debian-policy: Please provide policy for architecture wildcards)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#530687: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #530687, regarding debian-policy: Please provide policy for architecture wildcards to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#559116: marked as done (debian-policy: .changes fields Checksums-* missing from policy)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#478295: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #478295, regarding debian-policy: .changes fields Checksums-* missing from policy to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#478295: marked as done (Sha1 and sha256 in .changes and .dsc file)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#478295: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #478295, regarding Sha1 and sha256 in .changes and .dsc file to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#470633: marked as done (Explicitly say obsolete configuration files may be removed)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#470633: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #470633, regarding Explicitly say obsolete configuration files may be removed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#442134: marked as done (Inconsistency: half-configured vs. failed-config)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#442134: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #442134, regarding Inconsistency: half-configured vs. failed-config to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#284340: marked as done (Remove reference to UC in BSD license or remove license)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#284340: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #284340, regarding Remove reference to UC in BSD license or remove license to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#347581: marked as done (Allow library source packages to generate *-headers binary packages)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#347581: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #347581, regarding Allow library source packages to generate *-headers binary packages to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#328951: marked as done (Clarify relationship between targets and Build-Depends{,-Indep})

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#328951: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #328951, regarding Clarify relationship between targets and Build-Depends{,-Indep} to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#224509: marked as done (Don't require a TTY during maintainer script execution)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#224509: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #224509, regarding Don't require a TTY during maintainer script execution to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#506898: marked as done (Paragraph 6.3 (controlling terminal) is obsolete)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#224509: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #224509, regarding Paragraph 6.3 (controlling terminal) is obsolete to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#224509 closed by Russ Allbery (Bug#224509: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.0.0)

This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report which was filed against the debian-policy package: #224509: Don't require a TTY during maintainer script execution It has been closed by Russ Allbery . Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. If this explana

debian-policy_3.9.0.0_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: debian-policy_3.9.0.0.dsc to main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.9.0.0.dsc debian-policy_3.9.0.0.tar.gz to main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.9.0.0.tar.gz debian-policy_3.9.0.0_all.deb to main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.9.0.0_all.deb Override entries for your package: d

Processing of debian-policy_3.9.0.0_i386.changes

debian-policy_3.9.0.0_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-policy_3.9.0.0.dsc debian-policy_3.9.0.0.tar.gz debian-policy_3.9.0.0_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia

Processed: user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org, limit package to debian-policy, usertagging 547272 ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org Setting user to debian-pol...@packages.debian.org (was r...@debian.org). > limit package debian-policy Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'debian-policy' Limit currently set to '

Bug#547272: Clarification of the Format field in control files

Russ Allbery writes: > Here's an updated version of the proposed patch. I'm kicking out the next release, so I went ahead and merged this to get it in although the review period for the revision was rather short. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)

Bug#547272: Clarification of the Format field in control files

Le Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 03:34:54PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit : > > Here's an updated version of the proposed patch. > > diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml > index d489738..abb1a8e 100644 > --- a/policy.sgml > +++ b/policy.sgml > @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@ > > %versiondata; > + > + > ]> > > >