Bug#579457: debian-policy: finer granularity for perlapi-*

2010-05-06 Thread Brendan O'Dea
On 6 May 2010 23:26, Niko Tyni wrote: > I was trying to cater for the degenerate case of $Config{debian_abi}=0 > (which breaks the above short-circuit form) so dependants wouldn't have > to check for that. Sure, but this is not an arbitrary string which may accidentally contain "0". I think that

Processed: Update outdated mentions, typos and tags

2010-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 578664 + pending Bug #578664 [developers-reference] developers-reference: outdated examples in pkgs/resources.dbk Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 578664: http:/

Bug#579457: debian-policy: finer granularity for perlapi-*

2010-05-06 Thread Niko Tyni
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 09:39:42AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote: > On 6 May 2010 04:57, Niko Tyni wrote: > > I'm thinking the dependants could use something like > >  "perlapi-" . ($Config{debian_abi} || $Config{version}) > Rather than "evaluates to false", I'd suggest wording it: > > If $Confi