Bill Allombert writes:
> I just released 3.8.2.0. I made two minor changes to debian/rules:
>
> - use `dpkg --print-architecture' instead of obsolete form
> `dpkg --print-installation-architecture'.
> - fix a race condition while generating DEBIAN/md5sums.
> (force find to skip the DE
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> so it seems that the "alternative" interpretation, is that "if there
> is a interface, then it must be used", but all that is wrapped in a
> "should", which is not as binding as a "must".
While this section of policy could probably be clarified, violating
Sune Vuorela writes:
> To be honest, I also have a hard time seeing the issues, but after
> participating two days in a row debating this with different people in
> #debian-devel, I just thought that something must be unclear. I asked a bit,
> and a specific "should" the primary blame.
>
>>
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 20:05:40 Russ Allbery wrote:
> severity 533287 wishlist
> thanks
>
> Sune Vuorela writes:
> > There has recently on #debian-devel been a few discussions about
> > wether it was allowed to edit other packages configuration files (not
> > 'conffiles') in maintainer scripts.
>
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:51:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#525151: fixed in debian-policy 3.8.2.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #525151,
regarding Clarify format of source package name
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:51:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#519835: fixed in debian-policy 3.8.2.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #519835,
regarding debian-policy: Please add new sections to policy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:51:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#533257: fixed in debian-policy 3.8.2.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #533257,
regarding debian-policy: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:51:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#522364: fixed in debian-policy 3.8.2.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #522364,
regarding debian-policy: Remove obsolete /var/mail transition requirement
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:51:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#519706: fixed in debian-policy 3.8.2.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #519706,
regarding debian-policy: upgrading-checklist states policy 3.8.1.0 as
"unreleased"
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:51:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#519706: fixed in debian-policy 3.8.2.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #519706,
regarding debian-policy: Checklist specified 3.8.1.0 unreleased
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:51:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#522219: fixed in debian-policy 3.8.2.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #522219,
regarding debian-policy: Remove /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 FHS exception
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:51:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#206684: fixed in debian-policy 3.8.2.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #206684,
regarding Use of debconf for prompting should be mandatory except for essential
packages and pre-dependencies
to be marked as d
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:51:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#522218: fixed in debian-policy 3.8.2.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #522218,
regarding debian-policy: Discourage installation of Speedo fonts
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Accepted:
debian-policy_3.8.2.0.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.8.2.0.dsc
debian-policy_3.8.2.0.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.8.2.0.tar.gz
debian-policy_3.8.2.0_all.deb
to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.8.2.0_all.deb
Override entries for yo
Bill Allombert writes:
> I just released 3.8.2.0. I made two minor changes to debian/rules:
>
> - use `dpkg --print-architecture' instead of obsolete form
> `dpkg --print-installation-architecture'.
> - fix a race condition while generating DEBIAN/md5sums.
> (force find to skip the DE
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:08:07AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Bill Allombert writes:
>
> > Policy team:
> > This issue was already fixed by Colin in policy GIT repository.
> > Any objection with me releasing 3.8.2.0 to fix the package ?
>
> If you have the time at the moment to go through the
debian-policy_3.8.2.0_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-policy_3.8.2.0.dsc
debian-policy_3.8.2.0.tar.gz
debian-policy_3.8.2.0_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
severity 533287 wishlist
thanks
Sune Vuorela writes:
> There has recently on #debian-devel been a few discussions about
> wether it was allowed to edit other packages configuration files (not
> 'conffiles') in maintainer scripts.
>
> My interpretation of policy is that you are only allowed to ed
Bill Allombert writes:
> Policy team:
> This issue was already fixed by Colin in policy GIT repository.
> Any objection with me releasing 3.8.2.0 to fix the package ?
If you have the time at the moment to go through the release steps in
the wiki page, please go ahead. Otherwise, let me know and
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 533287 wishlist
Bug#533287: debian-policy: please clarify 10.7.4
Severity set to `wishlist' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:01:38AM +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 3.8.1.0
> Severity: important
>
>
> Hi
>
> There has recently on #debian-devel been a few discussions about wether
> it was allowed to edit other packages configuration files
> (not 'conffiles') in
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 04:06:21PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 3.8.1.0
> Severity: serious
>
> From my pbuilder build log:
>
> ...
> LANG=C debiandoc2text perl-policy.sgml
> gzip -cf9 perl-policy.txt > perl-policy.txt.gz
> LANG=C debiandoc2latexps policy.sgml
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.8.1.0
Severity: important
Hi
There has recently on #debian-devel been a few discussions about wether
it was allowed to edit other packages configuration files
(not 'conffiles') in maintainer scripts.
My interpretation of policy is that you are only allowed to
23 matches
Mail list logo
