Raphael Hertzog writes:
> On Mon, 11 May 2009, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I still think Build-Options-Supported is fundamentally the wrong way
>> to implement that. You have to modify every package to add it
>> anyway, in which case you can just as easily support it in the
>> package's debian/rules
On Mon, 11 May 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > If you refer to the fact, that dpkg-buildpackage cleans and rebuilds
> > everything and that it can take a lot of time, then please stop using
> > arguments that do not hold at all. you can call arbitrary debian/rules
> > targets with dpkg-buildpacka
On Mon, 11 May 2009, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog writes:
>
> > BTW, just to make things clear. It's likely that those Makefile
> > snippet (if we decide to go that way) become quite more elaborated as
> > we try integrating support for things like hardening-wrapper (see
> > #489771). E
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 03:43:41PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> You are a very special case: a developer since very long time, with a
> enormous knowledge of debian policy (and dpkg internal).
> But I really think that most people outside DD use dpkg-buildpackage
> because it is the easier
"Giacomo A. Catenazzi" writes:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> The only builds Debian supports are not just the buildd ones. As
>> members of the free software community, we should also cater to end
>> users building, tweaking, and rebuilding our software.
> You are a very special case: a
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> BTW, just to make things clear. It's likely that those Makefile
> snippet (if we decide to go that way) become quite more elaborated as
> we try integrating support for things like hardening-wrapper (see
> #489771). Expect stuff like "if debian/control has
> Build-Optio
On Mon, May 11 2009, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> On Montag, 11. Mai 2009, Bill Allombert wrote:
>> But policy allows creating directory like /usr/local/share/texmf in the
>> postinst.
> [...]
>> It seems to me that mktexlsr could honour policy if
>> /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R was only cre
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 528021 wishlist
Bug#528021: please purge /usr/local/share/texmf if empty
Severity set to `wishlist' from `important'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
On Mon, May 11 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sun, 10 May 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> I would prefer Debian to remain a full fledged member of the free
>> software community, and continue to not let build behaviour diverge
>> whether or not dpkg-buildpackage was used -- which can
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sun, May 10 2009, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 11:37:46PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On Sunday 10 May 2009 13:56:04 Steve Langasek wrote:
I thought it was generally recognized that it's a Bad Idea to implement
config files using your interpreter
Hi Bill,
On Montag, 11. Mai 2009, Bill Allombert wrote:
> But policy allows creating directory like /usr/local/share/texmf in the
> postinst.
[...]
> It seems to me that mktexlsr could honour policy if
> /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R was only created when it would be not empty
> (i.e. the user insta
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:43:35AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> reassign 528021 debian-policy
> severity 528021 important
> thanks
>
> Hi Norbert,
>
> On Sonntag, 10. Mai 2009, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > The problem is that it seems you don't have an idea about what ls-R files
> > are and how
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 528021 debian-policy
Bug#528021: please purge /usr/local/share/texmf if empty
Bug reassigned from package `tex-common' to `debian-policy'.
> severity 528021 important
Bug#528021: please purge /usr/local/share/texmf if empty
Severity set
reassign 528021 debian-policy
severity 528021 important
thanks
Hi Norbert,
On Sonntag, 10. Mai 2009, Norbert Preining wrote:
> The problem is that it seems you don't have an idea about what ls-R files
> are and how they are created.
I wouldnt call it _the_ problem here, but it surely has been p
On Monday 11 May 2009 09:49:31 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 11 May 2009, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Well, debuild calls dpkg-buildpackage most of the time, unless you give a
> > specific target (which would again possibly be of interest to those who
> > are interested in calling debian/rules b
15 matches
Mail list logo
