Re: What about default-syslog [Re: new release goal default-mta?]

2009-05-05 Thread Roger Leigh
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 09:07:34PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:52:29AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > > On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 10:36:51AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > > martin f krafft wrote: > > > > [moving debian-rele...@l.d.o to Bcc, continuing discussion in bug log]

Re: What about default-syslog [Re: new release goal default-mta?]

2009-05-05 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:52:29AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 10:36:51AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > martin f krafft wrote: > > > [moving debian-rele...@l.d.o to Bcc, continuing discussion in bug log] ... > I think it is a problem extending to all virtual packages,

Re: What about default-syslog [Re: new release goal default-mta?]

2009-05-05 Thread Simon Josefsson
Roger Leigh writes: > I think it is a problem extending to all virtual packages, and I would > like to see a more general solution which is applicable to all. It > might be worth revisiting past discussion, for example this thread: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/08/msg01281.html >

Re: What about default-syslog [Re: new release goal default-mta?]

2009-05-05 Thread Roger Leigh
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 10:36:51AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > martin f krafft wrote: > > [moving debian-rele...@l.d.o to Bcc, continuing discussion in bug log] > > > > also sprach Andreas Metzler [2009.05.04.1856 > > +0200]: > >> FWIW as previously discussed on debian-devel starting with the