Adeodato Simó writes:
> Anyway, I wrote to ask if somebody could please submit a bug against
> www.debian.org providing a list of the list of current Policy
> delegates, so that http://www.debian.org/intro/organization can be
> updated.
I just sent mail to Steve asking for the delegation to be u
+ Colin Watson (Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:51:55 +0100):
Hey,
> I've committed a fix to our git repository, of course
Oh, I see RT#1138 now, though I can't seem to find a mail mentioning
these delegations/incorporations, but that could just be me not keeping
up with may mail.
Anyway, I wrote to ask if
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Another option could be to add a new modifier, like P(rivate) or
> U(ser), to be used like XPBS-Field: which would preserve the X-. But
> then you need a new enough dpkg-dev to be able to get that field.
I like that idea. It's not a big deal to have to u
Hi!
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 01:10:20 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > Nils Rennebarth writes:
> > > > Usually, unknown fields are iggnored by the debian packaging system. To
> > > > avoid conflicts of user d
Hi!
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 12:03:09 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > If you're going to standardize a prefix that's purely for private,
> > internal use and will never, ever be standardized in any fashion, could I
> > convince you (and Nils) to use a pref
5 matches
Mail list logo
