Processed (with 1 errors): your mail

2009-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > submitter 360871 csh...@brucetelecom.com Bug#360871: timeoutd does not kill X or screen login sessions Changed Bug submitter from Daniel Dickinson to csh...@brucetelecom.com. > submitter 369304 csh...@brucetelecom.com Bug#369304: Quik uses OF i

Bug#518199: debian-policy: virtual package names for doom-related packages

2009-03-04 Thread Jon Dowland
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.8.0.1 Severity: wishlist Hello, please find attached a patch which adds some virtual package names used by doom-related packages to the authorative list in policy. Although the rules are that private, cooperating packages can use names outside of this list, and t

Re: Policy 3.8.1

2009-03-04 Thread Russ Allbery
"Giacomo A. Catenazzi" writes: > Maybe a policy release (i.e. in annonce or devel news) should recommend > not to do bumping only uploads. I can mention it in the release announcement. I usually upload all of my packages at least once per release cycle whether they need it or not, to move to ne

Re: Policy 3.8.1

2009-03-04 Thread Giacomo A. Catenazzi
Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 17:14:20 +0100, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: But in this manner there is a risk of unneeded upload, in order to increase policy version or to remove warning from lintian about old policy. I think to much upload could confuse also the developers. If

Re: Policy 3.8.1

2009-03-04 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 17:14:20 +0100, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: > But in this manner there is a risk of unneeded upload, in order to > increase policy version or to remove warning from lintian about old policy. > I think to much upload could confuse also the developers. > If the only reason fo