On Sun, Mar 01 2009, Carsten Hey wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 04:55:23PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> We could have a exim4 upload implementing in sid this rather quickly
>> after receiving a go.
>
> In general I much prefer a virtual package over a real one but I think
> we should wait a
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 09:54:25PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I think it's time (really, probably past time) for the 3.8.1 upload.
> There's still some stuff in flight, but that's always going to be true,
> and a lot of bugs are already fixed in Git.
>
> My intention is to upload 3.8.1 next week
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 09:44:41PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> You have a case here where the user has managed to run a complete
> system for a non-negligible period of time without ever installing an
> MTA (long enough to either configure oldstable in their sources.list,
> or for the version of
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 08:25:38PM +0100, Carsten Hey wrote:
> Among the problems we try to deal with the proposed solutions is, as
> Daniel wrote in <494422e7.2060...@debian.org>, that apt (and/or
> aptitude) take the alphabetically first package which provides foo and
> installs that to fulfill t
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 06:32:45PM +0100, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
Hmmm. I partially agree, but then we have an unnecessary exception:
such virtual packages must have only one "provider", or else there
will be problems (IIRC) on dpkg, apt or ddbuild, if such dependency
is d
5 matches
Mail list logo
