I think it's time (really, probably past time) for the 3.8.1 upload.
There's still some stuff in flight, but that's always going to be true,
and a lot of bugs are already fixed in Git.
My intention is to upload 3.8.1 next weekend, which will hopefully give me
time to prepare a corresponding Lintia
Adeodato Simó writes:
> Seconded, with or without:
>
>> + comment lines starting with #
> preceded by no whitespace.
>
> Or some wording to that effect. The rationale is that it's very common
> for files that accept #-style comments to accept them if # is preceded
> by whitesp
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
Setting user to debian-pol...@packages.debian.org (was r...@debian.org).
> package debian-policy
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: debian-policy
> tags 446712 pending
Bug#446712: Document comments are permitted
Am 2009-02-27 19:34:04, schrieb Bill Allombert:
> Well there were some problems with popularity-contest, see bug #326593
> IIRC for sending to both f...@example.com and b...@example.com:
> ssmtp allows
> sendmail -oi f...@example.com,b...@example.com
> but not courrier-mta which want
> sendmail
Hi,
On Sonntag, 1. März 2009, Carsten Hey wrote:
> And using stable and testing repositories together, e.g. during
> dist-upgrades, will be forbidden? If not, it can't be avoided.
So what? It's not supported and the user has to fix manually. No big deal.
regards,
Holger
signature.as
Hi,
On Sonntag, 1. März 2009, Carsten Hey wrote:
> In my opinion it is a way better practise to first update the policy and
> then adapt n packages instead of first change them in a way which is
> possibly against the policy and expect the policy to be updated
> accordingly.
There is nothing _aga
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 04:55:23PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Hello,
> [exim4 hat on]
> Neither me nor Marc could come up with obvious problems in the
> proposal. I doubt this is an importartant data point, though. I do
> not think I am exceptionally qualified to find any problems (if
> they
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 08:25:38PM +0100, Carsten Hey wrote:
> ... if apt would try to solve a dependency on the virtual package
> default-mta provided by exim4 and exim5 it would ... choose to install
> exim4 in the described case ...
In case of a virtual default-mta package, the existence of
a t
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 22:07:36 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> --- a/policy.sgml
> +++ b/policy.sgml
> @@ -2450,6 +2450,14 @@ Package: libc6
> See for details.
>
>
> +
> + In addition to the control file syntax described + id="controlsyntax">above, this fi
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 04:55:23PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> We could have a exim4 upload implementing in sid this rather quickly
> after receiving a go.
In general I much prefer a virtual package over a real one but I think
we should wait a bit until the following issues are clarified:
On
On 2009-02-27 Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 03:42:39PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
[...]
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/05/msg00381.html with the best
>> choice appearantly being <87ve1faria@frosties.localdomain> which
>> proposes that exim4 should provide de
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 22:07:36 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Julien Cristau writes:
>
> > meh. forgot to actually send this to the bug.
>
> Thank you!
>
> It occurred to me to check behavior with multiline fields as well. Here's
> a slightly modified version documenting that. Does this stil
* Russ Allbery [Sat, 28 Feb 2009 22:07:36 -0800]:
> It occurred to me to check behavior with multiline fields as well. Here's
> a slightly modified version documenting that. Does this still look good
> to you? (And also requesting seconds from others.)
> --- a/policy.sgml
> +++ b/policy.sgml
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
