Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 21:44:29 +0200
From: Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 01:08:40PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Josselin Mouette wrot
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:27:43 +0200
From: Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu
Hello Josselin,
Am 2008-07-06 14:28:15, schrieb Josselin Mouette:
> the restri
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:51:16 +0200
From: Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], 484656 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu
Le lundi 07 juillet 2008 à 02:48 -0400, Daniel Dickinson a écrit :
> And depends o
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:02:02 -0500
From: Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel Dickinson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, debian-policy@lists.debian.org,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: gnome, kde, x
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 17:51:13 + (UTC)
From: Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu
On 2008-07-06, Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> fd.o menus are
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 21:01:15 +0200
From: Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2008-07-06, Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PR
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:43:32 +0200
From: Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu
Le dimanche 06 juillet 2008 à 21:01 +0200, Loïc Minier a écrit :
> There are "only" 47 desktop files with Only
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 19:11:44 + (UTC)
From: Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu
On 2008-07-06, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > of Debian KDE/Gn
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 00:12:23 +0200
From: Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Daniel Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
debian-policy@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:
Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu
On
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 09:40:58 +0900
From: Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu
Le Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 12:35:34PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
>
>
> I think that writing a policy is the firs
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 22:41:26 +0900
From: Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Comparison between Destkop entry and Debian menu
specifications.
Le Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 12:12:23AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> XDG has less features tha
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 12:02:47 +0800
From: "Paul Wise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Second: XDG has less features than debi
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 18:14:07 -0700
From: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think that Russ is very pessimistic on the quality of the XDG
> des
On 15/08/08 at 11:01 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Giacomo Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> >> First, section 4.14 should list things that one does not need to
> >> describe in debian/README.source. For example, the use of one of the
> >> "standard" patch systems
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 15/08/08 at 11:01 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Giacomo Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> I think the better way is do it similar to copyright: for common
>>> patch/build system we should include only a link to the relative
>>> document. May
Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:42:23AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Quite some times I experienced them to be more pain than gain,
>>> too. It might be useful if people shift around complete hierarchies,
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:42:23AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> * Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-15 16:47:41 CEST]:
>>> So, is there any reason at all to use relative symlinks?
>> Quite some times I experienced them to be more pain t
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 07:49:14PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-15 16:47:41 CEST]:
>> During Manoj's "policy" talk at DebConf8, Gerfried opened the
>> subject of the policy's stand on relative and absolute symlinks,
>> which currently is "absolut
Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-15 16:47:41 CEST]:
>> So, is there any reason at all to use relative symlinks?
>
> Quite some times I experienced them to be more pain than gain, too. It
> might be useful if people shift around complet
Giacomo Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> First, section 4.14 should list things that one does not need to
>> describe in debian/README.source. For example, the use of one of the
>> "standard" patch systems (quilt, dpatch, simple-patchsys) doesn't need
>> to be docum
* Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-15 16:47:41 CEST]:
> (Further discussion should happen on [EMAIL PROTECTED], but please
> CC me.)
Same with me, I plan to scan the archives of the list, but am not
subscribed.
> During Manoj's "policy" talk at DebConf8, Gerfried opened the subjec
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> (Further discussion should happen on [EMAIL PROTECTED], but please
> CC me.)
>
> During Manoj's "policy" talk at DebConf8, Gerfried opened the subject
> of the policy's stand on relative and absolute symlinks, which
> currently is "absolute if going through top-level, r
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> First, section 4.14 should list things that one does not need to
> describe in debian/README.source. For example, the use of one of the
> "standard" patch systems (quilt, dpatch, simple-patchsys) doesn't need
> to be documented, since every NMUer should be able to work with
(Further discussion should happen on [EMAIL PROTECTED], but please
CC me.)
During Manoj's "policy" talk at DebConf8, Gerfried opened the subject
of the policy's stand on relative and absolute symlinks, which
currently is "absolute if going through top-level, relative
otherwise".
I wanted to give
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.8.0.1
Hi,
I really like the idea of documenting special things about a source
package in debian/README.source. However, I think that section 4.14
could be improved a lot.
First, section 4.14 should list things that one does not need to
describe in debian/README.
25 matches
Mail list logo
