On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 11:59:31AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> reassign 426877 debian-policy 3.8.0.1
> retitle 426877 Clarify what "sensible behaviour" is for init scripts
> thanks
> Ok, this confirms my initial feeling. Changing this in dpkg would require
> a wide-scale testing and much effo
Steve Langasek wrote:
>> I'm reluctant to change the default behaviour of start-stop-daemon at this
>> point. What do other people think of making --oknodo the default behaviour
>> and adding a new option to force the current default behaviour (exit with
>> failure if nothing had to be done)?
>
>
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 01:47:39 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I think being LSB compliant is good for Debian.
>
> The LSB init script specification *is a specification for the init scripts
> of LSB packages*. It has NOTHING to do with LSB compliance of LSB
> implementations. Debian is an
On Fri, 04 Jul 2008, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> # lighttpd running:
> ~# /etc/init.d/lighttpd start ; echo $?
> * Starting web server lighttpd
> [fail]
> 1
[...]
> > Iñaki, if you ever encounter
> > bad init scripts, please report bugs against the offending packages.
>
> In the above case which
El Viernes, 4 de Julio de 2008, Raphael Hertzog escribió:
> Ok, this confirms my initial feeling. Changing this in dpkg would require
> a wide-scale testing and much effort for little gains since the policy
> already require packages to behave sensibly.
It seems that some services return 0 and oth
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
> index c9bd84f..772afce 100644
> --- a/policy.sgml
> +++ b/policy.sgml
> @@ -5946,9 +5946,11 @@ rmdir /usr/local/share/emacs 2>/dev/null || true
> The init.d scripts must ensure that they will
>
On Fri, 04 Jul 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Here's a try (against current master branch):
> diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
> index c9bd84f..772afce 100644
> --- a/policy.sgml
> +++ b/policy.sgml
> @@ -5946,9 +5946,11 @@ rmdir /usr/local/share/emacs 2>/dev/null || true
> The init
Proud to be an American http://68.58.112.130/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Reply-To:
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> reassign 426877 debian-policy 3.8.0.1
Bug#426877: dpkg: Option "--oknodo" should be the default behavi
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
reassign 426877 debian-policy 3.8.0.1
retitle 426877 Clarify what "sensible behaviour" is for init scripts
thanks
Ok, this confirms my initial feeling. Changing this in dpkg would require
a wide-scale testing and much effort for little gains since the p
reassign 489135 developers-reference
severity 489135 normal
retitle 489135 developers-reference: uses debian-policy style wording
stop
In my opinion developers-reference should not use must/should/may
wording, because this makes readers confuse developers-reference with
debian-policy.
For examp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 489135 developers-reference
Bug#489135: debian-policy: how to document a repackaged .orig.tar.gz
Bug reassigned from package `debian-policy' to `developers-reference'.
> severity 489135 normal
Unknown command or malformed arguments to comma
The biggest and largest luxury store for shoes and bags is just one click away.
Recommended by thousands of satisfied customers worldwide, we carry dozens of
famous brands including:
Hermes
Adidas
Chanel Shoes
Paul Smith
Prada Shoes
Here you willc find hundred thousands of best design
13 matches
Mail list logo
