Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Patch attached. I can also create a bzr repository if that's helpful.
>
> For the future - yes please. Including a changelog entry.
Will do in the future.
> Britney uses it, but its not needed at that point, as p_a will read the
> stuff out of the .d
Your message dated Sat, 07 Jun 2008 22:22:40 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Rejected: Bug#434651: New virtual package: wims-extra
has caused the Debian Bug report #434651,
regarding debian-policy: New virtual package: wims-extra
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Sat, 07 Jun 2008 22:19:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Rejected: Bug#381729: Artistic Licence considered non-free
has caused the Debian Bug report #381729,
regarding Artistic Licence considered non-free
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Sat, 07 Jun 2008 22:26:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Rejected: Bug#435476: add MIT License as a common license
has caused the Debian Bug report #435476,
regarding base-files: add MIT License as a common license
to be marked as done.
This means th
Your message dated Sat, 07 Jun 2008 22:30:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Rejected: Bug#438492: Policies copyright rule doesn't fit
empty transitional packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #438492,
regarding Policies copyright rule doesn't fit empty transitional
This proposal requests relaxing Policy's copyright rules to allow for
completely empty packages that contain no files for use in transitions.
The contention was that such packages would then be immediately forgotten
by dpkg rather than lingering on the system.
There is no response in the bug to my
This proposal requests adding the MIT license (the Expat license version
of it) to common-licenses.
As explained in the bug, the minor wording changes to this license when
used by different packages make it not as common as it looks. In
addition, there is a general preference on the Policy list f
The general consensus in the bug discussion seemed to be that this was a
cooperating group of packages using the virtual package privately, which
doesn't require registering it with the central list. I'm not sure where
the line should be drawn for that, but in this specific case, there
doesn't see
Your message dated Sat, 07 Jun 2008 22:13:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Rejected: Bug#367650: allow pointers to info docs for licenses
like GFDL that apply to them
has caused the Debian Bug report #367650,
regarding allow pointers to info docs for licenses like GFD
This proposal (and its current title) were a bit confusingly phrased, but
the essence is to request that the Artistic license be replaced by the
Artistic 2.0 license in common-licenses.
There's another bug (#458385) requesting inclusion of the Artistic 2.0
license that includes more discussion of
This proposal asks to relax the requirements for debian/copyright to
permit pointers to info docs that contain the relevant license.
There are a few problems with this, some of which were spelled out in the
resulting thread. It prevents easily extracting all the relevant
copyright files from a se
>> But I might look at patches changing it (or better, bzr trees ready to
>> merge), if someone really wants it changed.
> Patch attached. I can also create a bzr repository if that's helpful.
For the future - yes please. Including a changelog entry.
> I also added a fix for logging that I'm no
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 15:44:09 -0400
Daniel Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Apparently menu-xdg is supposed to do this but does not, or else I am
> misunderstanding what it is supposed to do. I've filed a bug. Maybe
This is a misunderstanding on my part menu-xdg creates xdg entries for
th
Hello,
Olivier Berger schrieb am Wed 28. May, 20:32 (+0200):
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 3.7.3.0
> Severity: minor
>
> In "Appendix G - Diversions - overriding a package's version of a file (from
> old Packaging Manual)", there's some misleading explanations on dpkg-divert
> preferred u
This one time, at band camp, Stephen Gran said:
> This one time, at band camp, Russ Allbery said:
> > Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > We could add all or part of this range to the dynamic range.
> >
> > I think we should add all of 3-5 to the dynamic range. I'm sure
> >
This one time, at band camp, Russ Allbery said:
> Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > We could add all or part of this range to the dynamic range.
>
> I think we should add all of 3-5 to the dynamic range. I'm sure
> that Stanford isn't the only site that's already ignoring the
16 matches
Mail list logo
