You might as well kill the entire priority business from packages altogether
and rely entirely on the overrides. The priority is, after all, not really a
property of a package but a property of the distribution.
As long as there is no practical way for a package maintainer to verify the
correc
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Santiago Vila wrote:
> While it made possible to install all of optional, the idea of this
> policy was never that someone install all of optional. The idea was
> that when browsing the package list, a user could actually choose
> *whatever* set (small or big) of optional packa
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, Don Armstrong wrote:
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.7.3.0
Severity: wishlist
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UserTags: discussion
Tag: patch
The requirement of optional packages not to conflict with eachother
and not to depend on essential packages are outdated, and appear to
st
3 matches
Mail list logo
