Re: Should -dev packages providing .pc files depend on pkg-config?

2008-04-17 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:02:20PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote: > How is this different with _any_ dependency on the system? Do you > suggest that iceweasel should drop its libgtk dependency, because users > might want to use their own compiled version of it? iceweasel _uses_ libgtk. A -dev package

Re: Should -dev packages providing .pc files depend on pkg-config?

2008-04-17 Thread Bas Wijnen
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 07:21:15PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > > According to the suggested definition, if a package using this library > > chooses to use foo-config, it doesn't call pkg-config directly (and it > > may not call it at all, this depends on the inner workings of > > foo-config). >

Re: Should -dev packages providing .pc files depend on pkg-config?

2008-04-17 Thread Bas Wijnen
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 01:44:55AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >> > What if the library says "You must call /usr/bin/foo during build"? > >> > >> How does the library say that? Why can't I just have gcc -o baz baz.c > >> -lfoo > >> > >> How can the library make that not work? > > > By not s

Re: Should -dev packages providing .pc files depend on pkg-config?

2008-04-17 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Goswin von Brederlow said: > > You are missing the point. > > What if the library says "You must call /usr/bin/foo during build"? Which package is this? > The libarry does not use foo, only the user, so no depends? > Or idoes forcing users to use foo make foo part o

Re: Should -dev packages providing .pc files depend on pkg-config?

2008-04-17 Thread Bas Wijnen
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 07:57:00PM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 07:15:53PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > You are missing the point. > > > > What if the library says "You must call /usr/bin/foo during build"? > > But the library can't say "foo must come from a D