Your message dated Sun, 13 Jan 2008 01:11:32 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#460486: debian-policy: Section 10.1 as a mistake in
example makefile snippet.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
"Andres Mejia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 3.7.3
> Tags: patch
>
> Debian Policy Section 10.1 contains the following makefile snippet in
> regards to using the 'nostrip' option.
>
> ifeq (,$(findstring nostrip,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
> INSTALL_PROGRAM += -s
> end
On Jan 12, 2008 11:56 PM, Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 11:22:41PM -0500, Andres Mejia wrote:
> > Package: debian-policy
> > Version: 3.7.3
> > Tags: patch
> >
> > Debian Policy Section 10.1 contains the following makefile snippet in
> > regards to using the 'nost
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 11:22:41PM -0500, Andres Mejia wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 3.7.3
> Tags: patch
>
> Debian Policy Section 10.1 contains the following makefile snippet in
> regards to using the 'nostrip' option.
>
> ifeq (,$(findstring nostrip,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
> INSTALL
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.7.3
Tags: patch
Debian Policy Section 10.1 contains the following makefile snippet in
regards to using the 'nostrip' option.
ifeq (,$(findstring nostrip,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
INSTALL_PROGRAM += -s
endif
It should be:
ifneq (,$(findstring nostrip,$(DEB_BUILD_OP
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 460486 debian-policy: Section 10.1 has a mistake in example
Bug#460486: debian-policy: Section 10.1 as a mistake in example makefile
snippet.
Changed Bug title to `debian-policy: Section 10.1 has a mistake in example'
from `debian-policy: Sect
Academic Qualifications available from prestigious Non-Accredited
Universiities.
Do you have the knowledge and the experience but lack the qualifications?
AAre you getting turned down time and time again for the j oob of your
dreams because you just don't have the right letters afte
Hmmm... Russ and Gunnar seem to have traded positions. Whatever the
policy group decides is, of course, fine. Just let us know. I'll check
back in a few months if I don't hear anything more.
Gunnar Wolf wrote:
I'm more worried about the tons of changes this will inflict on the
pkg-perl group ;
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 11:33:23AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 12:39:30PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Since libuuid1 is essential, every system will end up with a libuuid
> > user/group, so why not just add it to base-passwd instead of creating it
> > dynamically ?
>
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 12:39:30PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Since libuuid1 is essential, every system will end up with a libuuid
> user/group, so why not just add it to base-passwd instead of creating it
> dynamically ?
In general I want to avoid almost all further creation of global static
10 matches
Mail list logo
