Hello there, my name is Masha.
I am aged 27 from Russia.
Please vote for me this way:
http://bestrussiabride.info/?idAff=34
Thank You Very Much!!!
Masha
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Russ Allbery dijo [Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 05:23:17PM -0800]:
> > Perl 6 is already distributed under version 2.0, currently included in
> > the Parrot package. As are over a hundred Perl 6 modules, currently
> > included in the Pugs package. We haven't split them out into separate
> > Debian packages
Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I was under the impression that the Perl 6 modules in the archive were
>> being packaged independently like the Perl 5 modules, since I think
>> I've seen several of them already. I didn't realize that you had a
>> monolithic pac
On Jan 10, 2008 8:38 AM, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wouldn't it make sense to accept all signed mails, or all mails signed
> by a DD? I don't know how hard it would be to implement in mailman.
Accepting all signed mail is usually a Good Thing (tm), yes. Even without
actually chec
Russ Allbery wrote:
That's additional information that I didn't have. Are all hundred of
those modules covered under the Artistic 2.0 license?
Yes, with the exception of 3 explicitly mentioned in the README.
I was under the impression that the Perl 6 modules in the archive were
being packag
On 09/01/08 at 09:21 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> ---+++---
> If the Maintainer address points to a mailing list then that list must
> be configured to accept mail from those role accounts in Debian used to
> send automated mails regarding the package. This includes mail from the
> BTS, all mails
6 matches
Mail list logo
