<> Votre site Internet 2008

2008-01-07 Thread <> Nos solutions PME 2008
Vous n'avez pas encore votre site Internet ? Nous vous proposons la création de votre site clé en main (*) Une conception adaptée avec des informations claires et précises. Une charte graphique optimisée et conçue pour vos activités. Voir nos créations Vous possédez déjà votre s

【INCLUBのメル マガお宝情報】(クジ 付き)NO.169- 究極のトレードシステム

2008-01-07 Thread INCLUB
**      【INCLUBのメルマガお宝情報】(くじ付き)    ◆貴方のビジネスパートナーです◆ **  ★「くじ」に当たれば有料独占広告が3回無料で配信できます   「くじ」はメルマガの最後の方にあります(1日3回まで) [EMAIL PROTECTE

Bug#452105: debian-policy: Homepage field in debian/control undocumented

2008-01-07 Thread Russ Allbery
Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Those are harmless warnings, those two programs were just failing to > recognize and ignore the field. But this does not affect the > functionallity. > > I've fixed the bogus warnings now in dpkg's git commit 2006f64. Ah, thank you. I've gone back to t

Bug#452105: debian-policy: Homepage field in debian/control undocumented

2008-01-07 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi, On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 12:37:14 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > When I try that, I get: > > > > dpkg-source: warning: unknown information field 'Homepage' in input data in > > package's section of control info file > > ... > > dpkg-genchanges: warnin

Bug#452105: debian-policy: Homepage field in debian/control undocumented

2008-01-07 Thread Russ Allbery
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > When I try that, I get: > > dpkg-source: warning: unknown information field 'Homepage' in input data in > package's section of control info file > ... > dpkg-genchanges: warning: unknown information field 'Homepage' in input data > in > package's sect

Bug#452105: debian-policy: Homepage field in debian/control undocumented

2008-01-07 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 10:50:22AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Maybe I am confused, but it seems to me that Homepage is only recognized > > in the source section and this hunk imply otherwise. > > dpkg-gencontrol looked to be fine with it in the b

Bug#452105: debian-policy: Homepage field in debian/control undocumented

2008-01-07 Thread Russ Allbery
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Maybe I am confused, but it seems to me that Homepage is only recognized > in the source section and this hunk imply otherwise. dpkg-gencontrol looked to be fine with it in the binary section as well. A setting in the binary section overrides the sourc

Bug#452105: debian-policy: Homepage field in debian/control undocumented

2008-01-07 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 09:45:06PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > --- orig/policy.sgml > +++ mod/policy.sgml > @@ -2182,6 +2182,7 @@ > Priority > (recommended) > Build-Depends et > al >id="f-Standards-Version">Standards-Version > (recommended) > + Homepage >

Bug#430649: New proposed wording for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS

2008-01-07 Thread Russ Allbery
Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> +flag must consist only of lowercase letters >> +(a-z), numbers (0-9), and the characters >> +- and _ (hyphen and underscore). >> +options must not contain whitespace. The same >> +tag should not be given multipl

Re: Homepage field specification

2008-01-07 Thread Russ Allbery
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello Debian policy lists, > > The new Homepage field is not documented, and neither is its value. > We should mandate the format of its value somehow. According to > current practice I propose we mandate > > Homepage: URI > > where URI is the URI of th

Re: Homepage field specification

2008-01-07 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On ma, 2008-01-07 at 18:03 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > Hello Debian policy lists, > > The new Homepage field is not documented, and neither is its value. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=452105 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". T

Homepage field specification

2008-01-07 Thread Bill Allombert
Hello Debian policy lists, The new Homepage field is not documented, and neither is its value. We should mandate the format of its value somehow. According to current practice I propose we mandate Homepage: URI where URI is the URI of the upstream homepage for the software. The URI should not be

Re: Bug#459403: libuuid1: missing depends on non-essential package passwd

2008-01-07 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 01:16:59AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 03:23:23AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 10:37:03AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > So e2fsprogs which is "Essential: yes" depends on libuuid1, so > > libuuid1 is effectively "Esse

2400 USA

2008-01-07 Thread diego uriel
Never lose again! casino gives you a chance to win! Sign up & collect $2400! Participate in friendly tournaments of any game you like! A giant progressive jackpot waits to be grabbed! USA players, you're in luck! Make Big Money your new cash cow and find out what VIP is all about$! Don't miss

【INCLUBのメル マガお宝情報】(クジ 付き)NO.168- おすすめです不労所得

2008-01-07 Thread INCLUB
**      【INCLUBのメルマガお宝情報】(くじ付き)    ◆貴方のビジネスパートナーです◆ **  ★「くじ」に当たれば有料独占広告が3回無料で配信できます   「くじ」はメルマガの最後の方にあります(1日3回まで) [EMAIL PROTECTE

Bug#430649: New proposed wording for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS

2008-01-07 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi, On Sun, 2007-12-30 at 19:23:58 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Okay, here's a revised proposal to address both Bug#209008 (parallel) and > Bug#430649 (DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS parsing). This proposal does the following: > --- orig/policy.sgml > +++ mod/policy.sgml > + > + debian/rules and

Bug#440420: [PROPOSAL] Manual page encoding

2008-01-07 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 11:37:30AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'm still open to whether new-world-order pages should go in > > /usr/share/man/LL.UTF-8 or just /usr/share/man/LL. Pros for LL.UTF-8: > > > > * Non-compliant implementations (I'm guessing

Re: Bug#459403: libuuid1: missing depends on non-essential package passwd

2008-01-07 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 03:23:23AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 10:37:03AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > So e2fsprogs which is "Essential: yes" depends on libuuid1, so > libuuid1 is effectively "Essential: yes", right? So if I add a > dependency on passwd, it will effecti

Re: Holbrook

2008-01-07 Thread Lauri Holbrook
I have been using manster for 2 months and I have gained a 1/2 inch in girth and 1/4 inch in length http://www.Invinsebels.com complaint against the FSA. it struggling with academic skills, into voluntary to use them (and when for your kids if you -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE