On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 07:41:10PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 04:00:28PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Unlike "required", "important" may include packages following other
> > conditions not related to this one (and in fact, most of them aren't), so
> > my proposal is to c
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.7.2.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
In the definition of priorities, "required" and "important" seem to collide
with each other. In particular, the part of "required" that reads:
"Packages which are necessary for the proper functioning of the system"
with th
2 matches
Mail list logo
