PolicyChange.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
I think we've got consensus, and certainly a couple of seconds to the
final draft of this item now.
Any objections before this can go in?
Neil
--
int getRandomNumber() {
return 4; // chosen by fair dice roll. guaranteed to be random.
}
// http://xkcd.com/c221.html
signature.asc
Description
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 15:44:27 +0200
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2007, Neil Williams wrote:
> > i.e. the reverse sense - the dbg name should be forced to use the lib
> > prefix where the only packages built from that source already use the
> > lib prefix.
> >
> > This is
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007, Neil Williams wrote:
> i.e. the reverse sense - the dbg name should be forced to use the lib
> prefix where the only packages built from that source already use the
> lib prefix.
>
> This is (IMHO) implicit in "library source package".
I think the package name should not be
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 14:08:35 +0200
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2007, Neil Williams wrote:
> > The principle here is to make upstream development on Debian easier
>
> To be clear, the only part I'm not confortable about is forcing the dbg
> name to start with the name
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007, Neil Williams wrote:
> ? This change only affects shared libraries - i.e. library source
> packages installing shared libraries in /usr/lib/ and with a -dev, not
> private libraries installed in /usr/lib/package/ and not application
> source packages that also contain shared l
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 11:55:54 +0200
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2007, Neil Williams wrote:
> > the -dbg (with SONAME)
> [...]
> > provide a binary package
> > librarynamesoversion-dbg
> [...]
> > Josh Tri
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 11:55:54AM +0200, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2007, Neil Williams wrote:
> > the -dbg (with SONAME)
> [...]
> > provide a binary package
> > librarynamesoversion-dbg
> [...]
> > J
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007, Neil Williams wrote:
> the -dbg (with SONAME)
[...]
> provide a binary package
> librarynamesoversion-dbg
[...]
> Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2007-04-22 19:48
Please don't impose "librarynamesoversion-d
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.7.2.2
Severity: normal
Previously discussed on debian-devel:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/04/msg00663.html
After the original idea, a more formal proposal developed:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/04/msg00692.html
"I'd like to see all lib
10 matches
Mail list logo
