Re: Bug#56440: lintian: Should check for shlibs that with incorrect package name

2007-04-24 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 09:49:55PM -0700, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > totem-xine is a bug. It's including plugins in /usr/lib/totem in its > shlibs file with bizarre SONAMEs. I'm not sure where the bug is, but I > think it's legitimate for lintian to complain about it. This becaus

Re: Bug#56440: lintian: Should check for shlibs that with incorrect package name

2007-04-24 Thread Russ Allbery
Fixing a typo in the cc to debian-policy that caused the original to not reach there. This discussion is about a lintian check for packages that provide a shlibs file that lists a dependency on some other package. Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 04:21:46PM -0500,

Bug#243037: Symbol ALERT

2007-04-24 Thread Brigida Honkanen
check -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#191036: Amazing, frankfurt symbol.

2007-04-24 Thread Jac mcmaster
waves -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#184064: Exchange news

2007-04-24 Thread Tracie Qasimali
automatic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#102213: This one is set, to rise.

2007-04-24 Thread Thama qwery
Robert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#90511: Rise symbol report

2007-04-24 Thread Keng Luciano
tiene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#122817: Investors report.

2007-04-24 Thread Sung prieur
Markets -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#420701: debian-policy: GFDL is now in common-licenses

2007-04-24 Thread Manoj Srivastava
severity 420701 minor thanks Hi, On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:27:44 +0200 (CEST), Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > base-files_4.0.0, just uploaded for unstable, has now the GFDL in > common-licenses (as both GFDL-1.2 and a symlink GFDL -> GFDL-1.2). > Therefore, the paragraph in policy sayi

Processed: Re: Bug#420701: debian-policy: GFDL is now in common-licenses

2007-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 420701 minor Bug#420701: debian-policy: GFDL is now in common-licenses Severity set to `minor' from `normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator

Bug#420701: debian-policy: GFDL is now in common-licenses

2007-04-24 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.7.2.2 base-files_4.0.0, just uploaded for unstable, has now the GFDL in common-licenses (as both GFDL-1.2 and a symlink GFDL -> GFDL-1.2). Therefore, the paragraph in policy saying "Note that the GFDL is new here, and the license file may not yet be in place in"