Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two

2006-11-24 Thread Jari Aalto
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 23:55 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: > > > Instead of focusing and hammering again and again on /bin/sh, why not > > > instead ask maintainers to do #!/bin/dash? > > > > Because the correct is #!/bin/sh and not to be tied on partic

Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two

2006-11-24 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Somebody needs to explain to Jari the concept of a shared text segment. > Bash: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep 'Private_Dirty' /proc/$$/smaps | perl -e '$t = 0; while (<>) { /(\d+) kB$/ or die "parse err: $_"; $t += $1 } print "tot: $t\n"' tot: 2800 Dash: $ grep 'P

Re: deluser on purge (was: Piuparts testing status update)

2006-11-24 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 06:16:28PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote: > > Every time the discussion has come up so far, there's been an absence of > > consensus about whether it was correct to attempt to reclaim user ids on > > purge. > When does GNU/Linux distributions support 32 Bit UID/GID's? Deb

Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two

2006-11-24 Thread Hubert Chan
On 23 Nov 2006 22:40:01 +0200, Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > My point. If there is explicit "Depends: bash", then someone can post > a patch to provide alternative solution to a person who may not know > alternative constructs (having learned only bashism). Sorry, but I don't understand

Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two

2006-11-24 Thread Jari Aalto
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 22:54 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: > > David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 07:09:49PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > > > > > > Now the choice of 464kB or 4528kB on a desktop where

Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two

2006-11-24 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 23:57 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: > And why do you think that? please take a look at the RES values. I know you don't understand it, because you just appealed to the RSS values. If many processes are sharing text, they all get accounted with the size of the resident text in the

Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two

2006-11-24 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 23:55 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: > > Instead of focusing and hammering again and again on /bin/sh, why not > > instead ask maintainers to do #!/bin/dash? > > Because the correct is #!/bin/sh and not to be tied on particular shell. I can't tell what you mean. There is nothing

Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two

2006-11-24 Thread Jari Aalto
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 21:08 +0100, David Weinehall wrote: > > You can use whatever bashisms you like when you're working > > interactively, that won't hinder dash from executing shells on boot and > > elsewhere. Using bashisms in scripts does howe

Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two

2006-11-24 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 21:08 +0100, David Weinehall wrote: > You can use whatever bashisms you like when you're working > interactively, that won't hinder dash from executing shells on boot and > elsewhere. Using bashisms in scripts does however cause a problem. I think it's time to realize that "

Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two

2006-11-24 Thread David Weinehall
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 11:10:19AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 22:56 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: > > Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 19:33 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: > > > > I don't see perl used that much for maintainer scri

Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two

2006-11-24 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 22:54 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: > David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 07:09:49PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > > > > Now the choice of 464kB or 4528kB on a desktop where you're actually > > using the shell for interactive things is

Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two

2006-11-24 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 22:56 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: > Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 19:33 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: > > > I don't see perl used that much for maintainer scripts, or daemon > > > scripts. > > > > Exactly the *point*. So why isn't this

Re: deluser on purge (was: Piuparts testing status update)

2006-11-24 Thread Michelle Konzack
Sorry for the late answer but I have found this message in the SPAM folder Am 2006-11-14 19:57:52, schrieb Steve Langasek: > Every time the discussion has come up so far, there's been an absence of > consensus about whether it was correct to attempt to reclaim user ids on > purge. When does GNU/

Bug#243037: WinMerge has Unicode support, Flexible syntax coloring editor, and Windows Shell integration.

2006-11-24 Thread Sibylla O. Becker
- Enables To Specify Different WINDOWS O. Setup Studio is an unattended computer installation system. Boot the DVD and create a clean and fast system without any real effort. - Enables To Specify Different WINDOWS O. The first, INSTALLER. DD *** CNHC *** CNHC *** CNHC *** Trade Date: Friday, No