Re: Bug#299007: base-files: Insecure PATH

2006-09-15 Thread Brendan O'Dea
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 12:01:12PM +1000, Paul Szabo wrote: >I note that Ubuntu has fixed this: > > https://launchpad.net/bugs/13795 I'm not familar with Launchpad, but I'm guessing that a status of "Rejected" doesn't mean that the bug was fixed. --bod -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE

Re: binNMU safe and ${binary:Version} or ${source:Version}

2006-09-15 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Steve Langasek wrote: > > The BIG problem is how to get the next-version. Say you have version > > 1.2-3. A binNMU would be 1.2-3+b1, a security release would be > > 1.2-3etch1 (unless there was a binNMU). > > In the Great Scheme, these were supposed to become 1.2-3+etch1 inst