At 1150848896 past the epoch, Linas Žvirblis wrote:
> Jon Dowland wrote:
> >> -- Text
> >> ++ Text Tools/Utilities/Accessories...
> >
> > Could you give an example of what would belong there?
>
> That is a no, unless you can provide a very accurate
> description, so that people would not think t
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Therefore, if the implementation of sbuild differs from whatever Policy
> happens to claim, then Policy is simply wrong.
As state before policy is wrong.
That doesn't mean we can't change both policy and sbuild at the same
time to something that both
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 03:36:30PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > The policy manual says (9.3.2 Writing the scripts):
> >
> > The init.d scripts should ensure that they will behave sensibly
> > if invoked with start when the service is al
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 07:52:01PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
>> >> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > Sbuild exp
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
>> Whenever this has been asked in the past, sbuild has simply declared
>> "this is how I want to do it." I have no idea why.
>>
>> If there is no technical reason for sbuild to behave this way, and
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
>>> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>> > Sbuild explicitely, by design, only looks at build-depends. So in order
>>> > for build-
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 03:36:30PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> The policy manual says (9.3.2 Writing the scripts):
>
> The init.d scripts should ensure that they will behave sensibly
> if invoked with start when the service is already running, or
> with stop when it isn'
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 07:52:01PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
> >> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > Sbuild explicitely, by design, only looks at build-depends. So
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
> Whenever this has been asked in the past, sbuild has simply declared
> "this is how I want to do it." I have no idea why.
>
> If there is no technical reason for sbuild to behave this way, and if
> it does not in fact conform to policy, how
9 matches
Mail list logo
