Do not ignore me please,
I found your aemail somewbhereb abnd now decided to write you.
I aam coming to your place in few weeks and thougaht we
can meet each other. Let me know if you doa not mind.
I am a nice pretty girl. Don't reply to this email.
Email me direclty at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
T
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
>> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Sbuild explicitely, by design, only looks at build-depends. So in order
>> > for build-depends to be useful at this time if you want a package t
Hire,
i am here sitting in the internet caffe. Found your email and
decided to write. I migaht be coming to your place in 14 days,
so I decided to email you. May be !we can !meet? I am 25 y.o.
girl. I have a picture if you want. No need to reply here as
this! is not my email. Write me at [EMAIL P
Jon Dowland wrote:
>> ++ Contrib/Applications
>> ++ Contrib/Games
>> ...
>> ++ Non-free/Applications
>> ++ Non-free/Games
>
> I think that could be confusing when packages migrate between
> main,contrib,non-free. I don't know how often that happens.
No, it is confusing because user would
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 10:50:46AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Sbuild explicitely, by design, only looks at build-depends. So in order
> > for build-depends to be useful at this time if you want a package to
> > build, you need to list mostly
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Previously, any new feature in dpkg which goes into release
> foo gets into policy in release foo + 1. Is there a compelling
> reason to diverge from this practice?
>
> manoj
Isn't that for binary packages because otherwise you can
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Sbuild explicitely, by design, only looks at build-depends. So in order
>> for build-depends to be useful at this time if you want a package to
>> build, you need to list mostly everything in build-d
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Sbuild explicitely, by design, only looks at build-depends. So in order
> > for build-depends to be useful at this time if you want a package to
> > build, you need to list mostly everything
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sbuild explicitely, by design, only looks at build-depends. So in order
> for build-depends to be useful at this time if you want a package to
> build, you need to list mostly everything in build-depends right now
> anyway.
Isn't it sbuild's job to co
On 17 May 2006, Peter Eisentraut told this:
> I would like to see some clarifications for section 12.3 "Additional
> documentation", in particular this:
>
> Any additional documentation that comes with the package may be
> installed at the discretion of the package maintainer. Text
> documentation
On 19 Jun 2006, Wouter Verhelst said:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 01:02:42PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On 16 Jun 2006, Goswin Brederlow stated:
>>> The Build-Depends and Build-Conflicts fields must be satisfied
>>> when any target is invoked.
>>
>> Does the converse hold as well? Is Build-D
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 16 Jun 2006, Goswin Brederlow stated:
>
>> the current use and definition of Build-Depends/Conflicts[-Indep] in
>> policy 7.6 don't match. Both use and definition also greatly reduce
>> the usefullness of these fields. This issue has come up again
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 18 Jun 2006, Goswin von Brederlow outgrape:
>
>> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
On the other hand the savings can be huge. Think about how many
packages install latex and fonts and generate
On 10690 March 1977, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> How about including more licenses in the list in 12.5 (and at the
>> same time adding them to base-files).
> How many packages are there under this license?
I have no numbers. I just proposed those two licenses because I see them
often in NE
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And now, I will give an extra command:
>
> % find /usr/share/doc -type f -name copyright | \
> xargs egrep -l 'GNU.+Documentation' | wc -l
> 168
>
> (On my laptop this number is 268.)
>
> This is because one and each of the binary packages coming from
15 matches
Mail list logo
