Bug#148194: Policy amendment to permit multi-line fields in debian/control

2006-04-11 Thread Russ Allbery
Hello folks, I have proposed a modification for Policy that will permit wrapping in the following fields in debian/control: Depends Recommends Suggests Enhances Pre-Depends Conflicts Provides Replaces Build-Depends Build-Depends-Indep Build-Conflicts

Processed: Re: Bug#148194: debian-policy: Clarification needed regarding multi-line fields

2006-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package debian-policy Ignoring bugs not assigned to: debian-policy > severity 148194 normal Bug#148194: [PROPOSAL] debian-policy: Clarification needed regarding multi-line fields Severity set to `normal'. > retitle 148194 [AMENDMENT 11/04/2006] Permi

Bug#148194: debian-policy: Clarification needed regarding multi-line fields

2006-04-11 Thread Russ Allbery
package debian-policy severity 148194 normal retitle 148194 [AMENDMENT 11/04/2006] Permit multi-line fields in debian/control thanks Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Here is the proposed patch. Now looking for seconds. > IIRC, only one person

Bug#361418: [Proposal] new Debian menu structure

2006-04-11 Thread Bill Allombert
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 01:56:50AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > #include > * Bill Allombert [Tue, Apr 11 2006, 12:34:45AM]: > > Yep. WRT you said above, what abot renaming "WindowManagers/Modules" to > "$wm Modules" (one level above WM starters and indicating which > "modules" are meant by that).

Re: Bug#148194: debian-policy: Clarification needed regarding multi-line fields

2006-04-11 Thread Frank Küster
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here is the proposed patch. Now looking for seconds. IIRC, only one person has so far seconded this. I've not been involved here, but it really sounds sensible. Therefore I second: > > --- policy.sgml.orig 2005-12-24 13:41:09.0 -0800 > +++ po

Bug#361418: [Proposal] new Debian menu structure

2006-04-11 Thread Linas Žvirblis
Eduard Bloch wrote: > Yep. WRT you said above, what abot renaming "WindowManagers/Modules" to > "$wm Modules" (one level above WM starters and indicating which > "modules" are meant by that). One more thing to consider is that if we will have to to move/rename modules in the future (current situa