Re: Bug#325234: debian-policy: mention if coincidence runlevels 2345 all same

2005-09-02 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 11:45:47AM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote: > On Thursday 01 September 2005 18:26, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 02:03:27PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) > wrote: > > > but is there really any good reason to have the default run-level > > >

Re: Bug#325234: debian-policy: mention if coincidence runlevels 2345 all same

2005-09-02 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 05:02:10PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote: > On Friday 02 September 2005 14:58, Wouter Verhelst wrote: [...] > > * We won't be able to change them on already running systems > > automatically: there are so many initscripts that it's very likely at > > least one

Bug#325234: debian-policy: mention if coincidence runlevels 2345 all same

2005-09-02 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 02:03:27PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote: > On Monday 29 August 2005 02:42, Brendan O'Dea wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 04:09:46AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote: > > Debian doesn't enforce a policy on the multi-user run-levels (2-5), this > > is the decision of th

Re: Bug#325234: debian-policy: mention if coincidence runlevels 2345 all same

2005-09-02 Thread cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
On Friday 02 September 2005 14:58, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 11:45:47AM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote: > > On Thursday 01 September 2005 18:26, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 02:03:27PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) > > Given that changin

Re: Bug#325234: debian-policy: mention if coincidence runlevels 2345 all same

2005-09-02 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 11:45:47AM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote: > On Thursday 01 September 2005 18:26, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 02:03:27PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) > wrote: > > > but is there really any good reason to have the default run-level > > >

Bug#325234: debian-policy: mention if coincidence runlevels 2345 all same

2005-09-02 Thread cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
On Friday 02 September 2005 03:21, Brendan O'Dea wrote: > Yes, a technical one. Given that the recommended way to call > update-rc.d is currently using the argument "defaults", achiving the > granularity described in to document above would require modifying all > packages calling update-rc.d . t

Re: Bug#325234: debian-policy: mention if coincidence runlevels 2345 all same

2005-09-02 Thread cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
On Thursday 01 September 2005 18:26, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 02:03:27PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote: > > but is there really any good reason to have the default run-level > > states differ from the LSB defined init-level states [1]? > > Is there any good reason