Re: upstream field in package description

2005-05-31 Thread Christian Schoenebeck
Es geschah am Mittwoch 01 Juni 2005 01:33 als Bill Allombert schrieb: > 1) Debian Policy mandate the information in the copyright file already: > > 12.5. Copyright information > --- > ... > > In addition, the copyright file must say where the upstream sources > (if

Re: upstream field in package description

2005-05-31 Thread Christian Schoenebeck
Es geschah am Freitag 13 Mai 2005 22:15 als Adeodato Simó schrieb: > * Christian Schoenebeck [Fri, 13 May 2005 21:41:46 +0200]: > > IMO at least the upstream source field should become mandatory for Debian > > packages in future. On some packages it's really not that easy to trace > > back the orig

Bug#291148: 'status' option should be required of init.d scripts

2005-05-31 Thread Bill Allombert
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 08:38:01AM -0700, Stephen Gildea wrote: > If bug #208010 goes too far, this bug report doesn't go far enough. > The "status" option should be required, not optional. Only if it can be > counted on will it be useful. Some initscripts cannot provide a status, because they do

Bug#291148: 'status' option should be required of init.d scripts

2005-05-31 Thread Stephen Gildea
If bug #208010 goes too far, this bug report doesn't go far enough. The "status" option should be required, not optional. Only if it can be counted on will it be useful. I'm interested in being able to check the status of services when I suspend and resume a laptop. Some services must be stopped