* Thomas Hood [Fri, 13 May 2005 23:54:52 +0200]:
> (Is there a way to browse debian-policy in CVS?)
If I understood correctly, http://cvs.debian.org/?cvsroot=debian-policy
may be what you want.
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
It is impossible to make anythin
On May 13, Christian Schoenebeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> packages in future. On some packages it's really not that easy to trace back
> the original upstream source, because not every maintainer is adding that to
> the copyright or README.Debian file.
Then open bugs on these packages, do no
This report was marked "pending" some months ago. I don't know what the
pending solution is (Is there a way to browse debian-policy in CVS?) but
I thought I should point out that debhelper's code snippets now use the
which program to check for runnability. Policy 9.3.3.2 should follow
debhelper's
This is one of our newest sites, thus we'd like to
inform you about this one. It is made especially for
the sonsumer, with nice GUI and negotiable menu.
The site is all about you, with cheep and bast errection mediccattions
you can see on the market. Just name the errection mediccattion -
and we
Christian Schoenebeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Es geschah am Freitag 13 Mai 2005 22:15 als Adeodato Simó schrieb:
>> Hence no need for this, its place is not the description but the
>> copyright file, already.
> Right, but as a package description field it's easy to ensure
> (automatical
Es geschah am Freitag 13 Mai 2005 22:15 als Adeodato Simó schrieb:
> That if a package does not contain those two bits of information in
> the copyright file (author and where to get the source), you should
> file a serious bug against the package, since the Debian Policy §12.5
> mandates t
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 09:41:46PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I would like to ask for adding a new field to Debian package descriptions
> which defines the upstream source of a package, that is the location where
> the original sources were downloaded and probably optional as
* Christian Schoenebeck [Fri, 13 May 2005 21:41:46 +0200]:
> IMO at least the upstream source field should become mandatory for Debian
> packages in future. On some packages it's really not that easy to trace back
> the original upstream source, because not every maintainer is adding that to
>
Hi!
I would like to ask for adding a new field to Debian package descriptions
which defines the upstream source of a package, that is the location where
the original sources were downloaded and probably optional as another field
the upstream authors, like:
Upstream-Source: http://www.getithere
How have you been,
Find out more from our site
1clickauthority.info
Bye,
Porfirio Golux
pink grapefruit yellow watermellon
Paul's grandson disliked studying for six weeks.. Another rule implemented was that the student was allowed to spend as much or as little time at the computer as he/she wi
You're Invited
Thanks to a private nomination, there are potentially three deals that will be
offered to you.
Notice - past credit history is NOT a factor for this promotion as long as we
recieve word from you within 36 hours.
In accordance with our terms please verify your information on
11 matches
Mail list logo
