On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 08:54:32AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>I'd like to be able to obtain Debian source (patched / unpatched)
>and I would like to know if it's possible to create a standardized
>alias at least for dbs/cdbs/dpatch.
>
>My understanding is that currently the targets are:
>
>
On Mar 29, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - - the traditional device names should be used by default
This is basically something which only concerns the maintainers of udev
and makedev, so I don't think it's useful to define it in policy
considering that there is an agreement that to do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 26 Mar 2005, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> Is there a project-wide policy for support for devfs (and devfs-style,
>> e.g. udev devfs.rules) device naming?
>
> Do it if you can. It is not mandat
Attention, This is your Third and Final Notification:
Thank you for your recent inquiry, we have been just been advised that two
lenders are interested in offering you a deal. Remember, for this special
offer past credit history is not a factor.
In accordance with our terms please verify your
4 matches
Mail list logo
