Wir stellen diese Kontakte für Sie her!

2005-03-24 Thread Agentur España
Title: Wir stellen diese Kontakte für Sie her! Guten Tagdebian-policy@lists.debian.org   Freitag, 25. März 2005Veröffentlichen Sie kostenlos Ihre Anzeige in unserem Anzeigenmarkt.Täglich bes

Bug#299007: base-files: Insecure PATH in /root/.profile

2005-03-24 Thread Bill Allombert
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 06:37:14AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In no way installing the debian-policy package introduce a security > > hole, causes serious data loss or makes unrelated software on the > > system break. > > Not the installation of the policy package, but the following of th

Bug#299007: base-files: Insecure PATH in /root/.profile

2005-03-24 Thread psz
Bill, Thank you for the explanations. > One of the rules is that policy proposal are wishlist by definition. Quite sensible: protect the policy-makers from blame and "litigation". I guess that the couple of "normal" bugs listed under http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=debian-poli

Re: Bug#299007: base-files: Insecure PATH in /root/.profile

2005-03-24 Thread Don Armstrong
[Sent to -policy just so people will know it's been responded to, please respond privately, or if this is a general question, on -mentors or -devel as appropriate.] On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > My question: are the public in general and bug submitters in > particular, expected o

Bug#299007: base-files: Insecure PATH in /root/.profile

2005-03-24 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 07:11:18PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Dear Debian BTS gurus, > > A day or so ago, in connection with another bug (#295435), I discovered > the existence and use of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Out of curiosity, I > tried to set the severity of this bug to critical; to my amazem

Bug#299007: base-files: Insecure PATH in /root/.profile

2005-03-24 Thread psz
Dear Debian BTS gurus, A day or so ago, in connection with another bug (#295435), I discovered the existence and use of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Out of curiosity, I tried to set the severity of this bug to critical; to my amazement, this worked; but then Manoj Srivastava set the severity back to wishlist