On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 01:39:28PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> In this report, the submitter complains about /usr/local/bin being in
> the PATH by default at the same time directories under /usr/local are
> root:staff and world-writable. His complain is based on the existence
> of become-any-grou
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 06:27:24PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 01:39:28PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > In this report, the submitter complains about /usr/local/bin being in
> > > the PATH by default at the same time di
I fully support removing this privilege of group staff; it simply makes
group staff root-equivalent.
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 01:39:28PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > In this report, the submitter complains about /usr/local/bin being in
> > the PATH by default at the same time directories under /usr/local are
> > root:staff and world-writable. His com
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 03:26:16PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I wholeheartedly agree and second this proposal. Also, /home should be
> root:root 0755 instead of root:staff 2775; it is only confusing and
> actually does not do anything useful.
Obviously it does: it allows an administrator
On Mar 11, Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wholeheartedly agree and second this proposal. Also, /home should be
> root:root 0755 instead of root:staff 2775; it is only confusing and
> actually does not do anything useful.
Agreed.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital sig
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 01:39:28PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> In this report, the submitter complains about /usr/local/bin being in
> the PATH by default at the same time directories under /usr/local are
> root:staff and world-writable. His complain is based on the existence
> of become-any-grou
Hi!
Santiago Vila [2005-03-11 13:39 +0100]:
> In this report, the submitter complains about /usr/local/bin being in
> the PATH by default at the same time directories under /usr/local are
> root:staff and world-writable. His complain is based on the existence
> of become-any-group-but-root bugs.
>
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 11:45:50AM +, tim hall wrote:
>
>
> OK, the crux of the matter is that I would like to give some guidance on the
> inclusion of .pngs as well as .xpms. I can see that it may suffice to quote
> menu icon policy verbatim and include any discussion of .desktop & .pn
In this report, the submitter complains about /usr/local/bin being in
the PATH by default at the same time directories under /usr/local are
root:staff and world-writable. His complain is based on the existence
of become-any-group-but-root bugs.
If this is a bug at all, I think we should probably d
Last Thursday 10 March 2005 14:26, Bill Allombert was like:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 01:22:07PM +, tim hall wrote:
> > I've been keeping an eye on the situation with regards to icons in menu
> > entries for A/DeMuDi - The multimedia CDD. Most of you have read this
> > before, I apologise for n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 299007 wishlist
Bug#299007: base-files: Insecure PATH in /root/.profile
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> reassign 299007 debian-policy
Bug#299007: base-files: Insecure PATH in /root/.profile
Bug reassigned from package `base-files' to `debian-pol
12 matches
Mail list logo
