On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 04:11, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:44:28PM -0500, Alexander Winston wrote:
> > After speaking with Robert Jordens and several of my colleagues
> > about it, I feel more comfortable encouraging the behavior that is
> > referenced in RFC 2396, Appendix E
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 07:32:30PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:
> > Packages using debhelper appear to still use /etc/init.d directly.
> Not really:
Yeah, sorry - I appear to have managed to pick on an older package to
check against.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it,
On 30.12.03 17:50 Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 10:18:18AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Dan Jacobson wrote:
not restart the services on package upgrades. Broken ones still calling
/etc/init.d/whatever directly will, but that's a bug: report it wh
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:44:28PM -0500, Alexander Winston wrote:
> After speaking with Robert Jordens and several of my colleagues
> about it, I feel more comfortable encouraging the behavior that is
> referenced in RFC 2396, Appendix E. The suggestion is the enclosure of
> URIs---URLs incl
4 matches
Mail list logo