Re: Bad version number based on date advice in policy?

2003-11-27 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 01:04:51PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:49:38PM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > [policy 3.1.2] > > I would suggest using 0.MMDD to avoid using epoch when upstream > > finally decides to use version 1.0 instead. > > What's wrong with using

Re: Bad version number based on date advice in policy?

2003-11-27 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:49:38PM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > [policy 3.1.2] > > I would suggest using 0.MMDD to avoid using epoch when upstream > > finally decides to use version 1.0 instead. > > What's wrong with using an epoch? Most peop

Re: Bad version number based on date advice in policy?

2003-11-27 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:49:38PM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote: [policy 3.1.2] > I would suggest using 0.MMDD to avoid using epoch when upstream > finally decides to use version 1.0 instead. What's wrong with using an epoch? -- Wouter Verhelst Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org Ned