Re: Init.d script, preventing start of one service

2003-11-15 Thread Sylvain LE GALL
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 01:37:44PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 04:27:03PM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote: > > Hello, > > > > In one of the package i maitain i have a config script which begin by > > asking if the service attached to this package need to be run. I use a >

Re: Init.d script, preventing start of one service

2003-11-15 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 04:27:03PM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote: > Hello, > > In one of the package i maitain i have a config script which begin by > asking if the service attached to this package need to be run. I use a > variable ( stored in /etc/default/mldonkey -- LAUNCH_AT_STARTUP="yes" ) > t

Bug#218893: Proposal: debian/rules.version file [Fix for the build-arch problem]

2003-11-15 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 04:01:25AM -0600, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote: > So you are going to implement this even if the discussion is not already > closed. Of course you can implement it anyway, but it's unfair to ignore what > Branden Robinson asked: > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: Bug#218893: Proposal: debian/rules.version file [Fix for the build-arch problem]

2003-11-15 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 01:54:51PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: > In response to Branden's question (does debian/control already have to > exist when the package is unpacked), I would suggest the following: > > Before debian/rules build* is run, one has to check the > build-dependencies. So at thi