Bug#214059: new microsoft critical patch

ALERT!This e-mail, in its original form, contained one or more attached files that were infected with a virus, worm, or other type of security threat. This e-mail was sent from a Road Runner IP address. As part of our continuing initiative to stop the spread of malicious viruses, Road Runner scans

Bug#212153: New Network Security Patch

ALERT!This e-mail, in its original form, contained one or more attached files that were infected with a virus, worm, or other type of security threat. This e-mail was sent from a Road Runner IP address. As part of our continuing initiative to stop the spread of malicious viruses, Road Runner scans

Re: Processed: your mail

On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 05:55:59PM +0200, Martin Godisch wrote: > noowner 185943 > noowner 208010 > noowner 208011 > thanks > > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 16:31:24 +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > I'm sure I already said that this isn't an appropriate use of 'owner' > > (regardless of the fact that the

Processed: Re: Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > noowner 185943 Bug#185943: [ACCEPTED] new virtual package: inetd-superserver Removed annotation that Bug was owned by Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > noowner 208010 Bug#208010: [PROPOSAL] init script LSB 1.3 compliance Removed annotation that Bug

Re: Processed: your mail

On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 05:04:23PM +0200, Martin Godisch wrote: > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 16:17:12 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > You're already the submitter of all of those, what's the point? > > To receive replies not CCing me. I'm sure I already said that this isn't an appropriate use of 'owne

Re: Processed: your mail

On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 06:18:18AM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > owner 185943 ! > Bug#185943: [ACCEPTED] new virtual package: inetd-superserver > Owner recorded as Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > > owner 208010 ! > Bug#208010: [PROPOSAL] init script LSB 1.3 compliance > Owne