This one time, at band camp, Daniel B. said:
> Chris Waters wrote:
> > I am dependent on coffee, therefore coffee is a dependency of mine.
>
> Not that I can swear that I've never heard the usage you claim, but do
> you have a definition from a (professional) dictionary that documents
> that usa
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:45:23PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I've read the bug report and I'm interested to know if this bug is
> being considered by the policy people or not. I've also read a bit of
> the debian-policy archives but it seems that the issue hasn't been
> resolved.
We had
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 03:49:01PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> We had another discussion on where to put the contents of -doc packages
> separate from the bug report in which a degree of consensus was reached,
> but I can't seem to find it now. I'll keep searching...
Thanks, I'm interested.
Anywa
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 01:23:03PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 3.6.1.0
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> diff -r -u debian-policy-3.6.1.0.orig/mime-policy.sgml
> debian-policy-3.6.1.0/mime-policy.sgml
> --- debian-policy-3.6.1.0.orig/mime-policy.sgml
Hi all,
I've read the bug report and I'm interested to know if this bug is
being considered by the policy people or not. I've also read a bit of
the debian-policy archives but it seems that the issue hasn't been
resolved.
TIA.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -- Master in Computer Science @ Uni
Chris Waters wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:57:16PM -0400, Daniel B. wrote:
>
> > Since the other package is not dependent on perl, then by your own
> > dictionary's definition, the other package is not a dependency of
> > perl. (Any divergence between us yet?)
>
> This is your point of
6 matches
Mail list logo
