Re: Some 2 year old proposals

On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 11:35:28AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > * #80343: [PROPOSAL] policy should say no files should be owned by > >"nobody" > >Package: debian-policy; Severity: wishlist; Reporte

Bug#82310: Provides: java-servlet-engine

From my mail to debian-java (http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2003/debian-java-200307/msg00054.html): I don't think it makes sense. Sure, packages that contain webapps can depend on "java-servlet-engine" and put their webapp in /usr/share/java/webapps. But how do they tell any arbitrary ser

Bug#80343: Some 2 year old proposals

On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 11:35:28AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > * #80343: [PROPOSAL] policy should say no files should be owned by > >"nobody" > >Package: debian-policy; Severity: wishlist; Reported

Explanation for recently retired proposals

* #78014: [PROPOSAL] dpkg Build Directory Package: debian-policy; Severity: wishlist; Reported by: "Eric Gillespie Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 2 years and 266 days old. 78014 essentially got no support, requires a chang

Some 2 year old proposals

Hi, I was looking at a few older proposals, and was wondering about disposition. * #80343: [PROPOSAL] policy should say no files should be owned by "nobody" Package: debian-policy; Severity: wish

Automated reply

This is an automated response to your e-mail. Your e-mail has been received by the McCall Pattern Company: Butterick, McCall's and Vogue Patterns. E-mail is answered in the order it i

Simplicity Pattern Co. AutoReply

Hello, Thank you for contacting Simplicity Pattern Co. This Auto-Reply message is being sent to you as a convenience to let you know that we have received your email message. We will attempt to reply to your email as quickly as possible. EXTREMELY IMPORTANT WARNING: We DO NOT send out any spa

Content violation

Content violation found in email message. From: debian-policy@lists.debian.org To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Thank you! Matching Subject: *re: thank you!*