Processed: Moving old proposals out

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 78014 fixed Bug#78014: [PROPOSAL] dpkg Build Directory There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > retitle 78014 [OLD PROPOSAL] dpkg Build Directory Bug#78014: [PROPOSAL] dpkg Build Directory Changed Bug title. > tags 82595 fixed Bug#82595: [PRO

Bug#203728: marked as done ([ACCEPTED] Please add virtual package myspell-dictionary)

Your message dated Tue, 19 Aug 2003 11:47:06 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#203728: fixed in debian-policy 3.6.1.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#187297: marked as done (debian-policy: bad url for debconf stats)

Your message dated Tue, 19 Aug 2003 11:47:06 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#187297: fixed in debian-policy 3.6.1.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#193748: marked as done ([ACCEPTED] gcc-3.3 no longer has )

Your message dated Tue, 19 Aug 2003 11:47:06 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#193748: fixed in debian-policy 3.6.1.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#188030: marked as done (dpkg _does_ attempt to unwind after errors during removal)

Your message dated Tue, 19 Aug 2003 11:47:06 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#188030: fixed in debian-policy 3.6.1.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#176506: marked as done ([AMENDMENT 2003/08/03] Make Debconf the standard for prompting the user)

Your message dated Tue, 19 Aug 2003 11:47:06 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#176506: fixed in debian-policy 3.6.1.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#187250: marked as done (init.d/bind example restart rules is broken)

Your message dated Tue, 19 Aug 2003 11:47:06 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#187250: fixed in debian-policy 3.6.1.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#200440: marked as done (debian-policy: 10.3.3 should refer to sysv-rc, not to sysvinit)

Your message dated Tue, 19 Aug 2003 11:47:06 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#200440: fixed in debian-policy 3.6.1.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

CVS srivasta: Josip:

CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy Module name:debian-policy Changes by: srivastaTue Aug 19 06:32:23 MDT 2003 Modified files: . : policy.sgml upgrading-checklist.html debian : changelog Log message: Josip: * Removed obsolete section on obso

Fw: Debian-policy! See her on your monitor, invite her to home v HTTMy PX

coq Debian-policy UQknILR E tB

Fw: the SlCKEST pIace on E/\RTH? T C z rW

Hey zopTW lPmT Debian-policy Debian-policy jvnd