On Jul 21, Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm still waiting for the inetd packages providing inetd-superserver,
>which they should do some day as Marco said, and for policy legalizing
I'm still waiting for somebody interested in rewriting update-inetd, and
I'm not holding my breath.
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 01:54:59PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > By "unenforceable" you mean that ftp.debian.org do not allow NMUs?
>
> No, I mean that a complete consistency in the set of 10K packages is
> practically impossible to achieve, let alone su
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 01:54:59PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > I second the clarifying paragraph. I object to changing to "should".
> > > We must fix the wrong priorities once and forever, and keep them sane
> > > sane from release to release. If the *current* ftpmasters have not
> > > achiev
Title: ai fammi sognare
ai fammi sognare, ancora un po'
leggermente ho tanta troppa voglia, non posso aspettare Succhiami così
leggermente ancora ... ancora di più ... di più
Mi sento umida
Toccami!
Mmmhh...dai fammi sognare, ancora un po' leggermente ho tanta troppa voglia, non
po
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 01:25:35PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > I second the clarifying paragraph. I object to changing to "should".
> > We must fix the wrong priorities once and forever, and keep them sane
> > sane from release to release. If the *curr
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 01:25:35PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I second the clarifying paragraph. I object to changing to "should".
> We must fix the wrong priorities once and forever, and keep them sane
> sane from release to release. If the *current* ftpmasters have not
> achieved this goal yet
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 01:52:58PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> [...]
>
> I propose this patch:
>
> --- policy.sgml~2003-07-21 12:17:53.0 +0200
> +++ policy.sgml 2003-07-21 12:31:13.0 +0200
> @@ -779,11 +779,24 @@
>
>
>
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy
Module name:debian-policy
Changes by: joy Mon Jul 21 04:50:06 MDT 2003
Modified files:
. : upgrading-checklist.html policy.sgml
debian : changelog
Log message:
removed obsolete section on obsolete constructs a
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 01:52:58PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
[...]
I propose this patch:
--- policy.sgml~2003-07-21 12:17:53.0 +0200
+++ policy.sgml 2003-07-21 12:31:13.0 +0200
@@ -779,11 +779,24 @@
- Packages must not depend on packages with lo
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 07:21:41AM +0100, Martin Godisch wrote:
> Hence, I'm proposing a new virtual package name "internet-server" (or
> something like that).
On my relatively recent sid system:
% apt-cache showpkg inetd-superserver
Package: inetd-superserver
Versions:
Reverse Depends:
noffle
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 12:33:52PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I propose this patch:
>
> --- policy.sgml~2003-07-21 12:17:53.0 +0200
> +++ policy.sgml 2003-07-21 12:31:13.0 +0200
> @@ -779,11 +779,24 @@
>
>
>
> - Packages must not depend on packag
11 matches
Mail list logo
