On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 01:20:12AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Given that the check is done before asking any question in the
> postinst, if you do install all three of the packages, the first one
> whose postinst runs shall ask the question, and create the file;
> subsequently, the o
Andreas Metzler wrote:
> I have not doublechecked packages.d.o. but the package's control file
> lists exim4, exim4-config, exim4-base and exim4-daemon-light as
> Priority: important and I cannot remember getting a mail about
> override disparities.
It does have that priority, but debootstrap stil
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 12:25:50AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Mark Baker wrote:
>> I believe exim4 should be the default mailer by the time sarge is
>> released, at least if its maintainers believe it is stable enough (I'm
>> now using it myself on my server, and I believe that it is).
> Has the
Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 12:25:50AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > I believe exim4 should be the default mailer by the time sarge is
> > > released, at least if its maintainers believe it is stable enough (I'm
> > > now using it myself on my server, and I believe that it is).
>
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 12:25:50AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I believe exim4 should be the default mailer by the time sarge is
> > released, at least if its maintainers believe it is stable enough (I'm
> > now using it myself on my server, and I believe that it is).
>
> Has there been any prog
Mark Baker wrote:
> I believe exim4 should be the default mailer by the time sarge is
> released, at least if its maintainers believe it is stable enough (I'm
> now using it myself on my server, and I believe that it is).
Has there been any progress on getting exim4 into base yet? It's best to
d
6 matches
Mail list logo
