Title: Are you smoker? You can save money on tobacco!
Are you smoker?
We are proud to invite You to new Tobacco Shop http://www.megatobacco.com.
We have special prices at discounts and free shipping as our
gift for our customers.
We have more than 100 of marks of cigarettes from Marlboro, Cam
Title: Are you smoker? You can save money on tobacco!
Are you smoker?
We are proud to invite You to new Tobacco Shop http://www.megatobacco.com.
We have special prices at discounts and free shipping as our
gift for our customers.
We have more than 100 of marks of cigarettes from Marlboro, Cam
Hi Colin!
On Mon, 09 Jun 2003, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 12:05, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sun, 08 Jun 2003, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ echo $LANG
> > > nl_BE.UTF-8
> >
> > Is it in locale.gen? Otherwise, you will NOT have the locale infor
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 10:59:18AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > It can be worthwhile to state explicitly what happen for source
> > arch:all packages in the policy.
>
> He's right. Lots of Arch: all packages (correctly) use
> Build-Depends-Indep and not Build-Depends at all. With this change
On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 12:05, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Jun 2003, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ echo $LANG
> > nl_BE.UTF-8
>
> Is it in locale.gen? Otherwise, you will NOT have the locale information...
Ah, good call. We should have that in the default loca
On Sun, 08 Jun 2003, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ echo $LANG
> nl_BE.UTF-8
Is it in locale.gen? Otherwise, you will NOT have the locale information...
> which means that uxterm manually ensures that $LANG is set to
> something.UTF-8, since I set my $LANG to nl_BE.
Ick.
--
"O
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 11:45:13AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > He's right. Lots of Arch: all packages (correctly) use
> > Build-Depends-Indep and not Build-Depends at all. With this change to
> > policy, almost all of them will immediately cease being policy
> > compliant. (Most have debhelpe
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 10:59:18AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 06:31:31PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > > I therefore propose the following change to section 7.6, which is a
> > > > partial rollback from #164035:
> > > >
> > > > `Build-Depends-Indep', `Build-Co
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 10:59:18AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 06:31:31PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
[...]
> > > Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > I therefore propose the following change to section 7.6, which is a
> > > > partial rollback from #164035:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 06:31:31PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > I therefore propose the following change to section 7.6, which is a
> > > partial rollback from #164035:
> > >
> > > `Build-Depends-Indep', `Build-Conflicts-Indep'
> > >The `Build-Depends-Indep' and `Build-C
10 matches
Mail list logo